The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Internet-Based Behavioral Interventions for Obesity: An Updated Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
The objective of this systematic review is to update a previous systematic review on the effectiveness of internet-based interventions for weight loss and weight loss maintenance in overweight and obese people with new or additional studies. A literature search from 2008 to March 2010 was conducted. Studies were eligible for inclusion if: participants were adults with a body mass index ≤ 25, at least one study arm involved an internet-based intervention and the primary aims were weight loss or maintenance. Eight additional studies over the eighteen included in the previous review met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted on sample characteristics, attrition, weight loss, duration of treatment and maintenance of weight loss. Effect sizes (Hedges g) and relative 95% confidence intervals were calculated for all two-way comparisons within each study. No attempt was made to pool the data in a meta-analysis because of the great heterogeneity of designs among studies. An examination of effect sizes show that the higher significant effects pertain studies that found a superiority of behavioral internet-based programs enhanced by features such as tailored feedback on self-monitoring of weight, eating and activity over education only internet-based interventions. However, control groups are very different among studies and this heterogeneity probably accounts for much of the variance in effect sizes. Hence, questions still remain as to the effectiveness of web-based interventions in achieving weight loss or maintenance. Implications for further research include using a “real” control group in order to make meta-analysis possible and developing multi-factorial design in order to separate components of interventions and identify which of them or patterns of them are keys to success.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Moreover, these interventions do not require traditional in-site visits, and thus, help reduce participants’ time and financial costs [16].”
From A systematic review of artificial intelligence chatbots for promoting physical activity, healthy diet, and weight loss (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses [15–19] have shown that these digital technology-based programs resulted in increased PA and reduced body weight, at least for a short duration.”
From A systematic review of artificial intelligence chatbots for promoting physical activity, healthy diet, and weight loss (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1998) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e565682010-001 · Cited by 9,453
Prospective Studies Collaboration (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60318-4 · Cited by 4,807
Excess Deaths Associated With Underweight, Overweight, and Obesity
Flegal, K. M. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.15.1861 · Cited by 2,811
(1998) · PubMed · Cited by 2,737
Long-term maintenance of weight loss: Current status.
Jeffery, R. W., Epstein, L. H., Wilson, G. T., Drewnowski, A., Stunkard, A. J., & Wing, R. R. (2000) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.19.suppl1.5 · Cited by 1,093
Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program
Tate, D. F. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.9.1172 · Cited by 925 · cited 2×
“Keywords: Internet, obesity, systematic review, meta-analysis, weight loss, weight loss maintenance.”
BackgroundThe effect of obesity on health outcomes
Dixon, J. B. (2009) · Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.mce.2009.07.008 · Cited by 845
A self-regulation program for maintenance of weight loss
Wing, R. R., Tate, D. F., Gorin, A. A., Raynor, H. A., & Fava, J. L. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa061883 · Cited by 830
Systematic Review: An Evaluation of Major Commercial Weight Loss Programs in the United States
Tsai, A. G., & Wadden, T. A. (2005) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-142-1-200501040-00012 · Cited by 815
Tate, D. F., Jackvony, E. H., & Wing, R. R. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.14.1833 · Cited by 666
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Burke, L. E., Ma, J., Azar, K. M. J., Bennett, G. G., Peterson, E. D., Zheng, Y., Riley, W., Stephens, J., Shah, S. H., Suffoletto, B., et al. (2015) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000232 · Cited by 516
Online Prevention Aimed at Lifestyle Behaviors: A Systematic Review of Reviews
Kohl, L. F., Crutzen, R., & de Vries, N. K. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2665 · Cited by 388
Hutchesson, M. J., Rollo, M. E., Krukowski, R., Ells, L., Harvey, J., Morgan, P. J., Callister, R., Plotnikoff, R., & Collins, C. E. (2015) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12268 · Cited by 380
Oh, Y. J., Zhang, J., Fang, M.-L., & Fukuoka, Y. (2021) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-021-01224-6 · Cited by 278
Pilot evaluation of the text4baby mobile health program
Evans, W. D., Wallace, J. L., & Snider, J. W. (2012) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-1031 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Manzoni, G. M., Pagnini, F., Corti, S., Molinari, E., & Castelnuovo, G.
- Affiliations
- IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT)
- University of Bergamo (IT)
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Manzoni, Gian Mauro
- Venue
- Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2011-03-04
- Volume
- 07
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-28
- ISSN
- 1745-0179 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3087973
- OpenAlex
- W1999806594
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IRIS eCampus Telematic University (Università degli Studi eCampus) (submittedVersion)
- PubliCatt (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Keywords
- online intervention, obesity, weight loss, weight loss maintenance, overweight adults, behavioral interventions, self-monitoring, personalized feedback, dietary habits, physical activity, control group design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
