Cited by 460Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsObesity, Physical Activity, DietDigital Mental Health Interventions

Effectiveness of web‐based interventions in achieving weight loss and weight loss maintenance in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review with meta‐analysis

Neve, M., Morgan, P. J., Jones, P. R., Collins, C. E.·2010·Obesity Reviews

Abstract

Summary: The objectives of this systematic review are to evaluate the effectiveness of web‐based interventions on weight loss and maintenance and identify which components of web‐based interventions are associated with greater weight change and low attrition rates. A literature search from 1995 to April 2008 was conducted. Studies were eligible for inclusion if: participants were aged ≥18 years with a body mass index ≥25, at least one study arm involved a web‐based intervention with the primary aim of weight loss or maintenance, and reported weight‐related outcomes. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen studies aimed to achieve weight loss, and five focused on weight maintenance. Heterogeneity was evident among the studies with seven research questions examined across interventions of varying intensity. Seven studies were assessed for effectiveness based on percentage weight change, with four studies deemed effective. Although the four meta‐analyses suggest meaningful weight change, it is not possible to determine the effectiveness of web‐based interventions in achieving weight loss or maintenance due to heterogeneity of designs and thus the small number of comparable studies. Higher usage of website features may be associated with positive weight change, but we do not know what features improve this effect or reduce attrition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-789x.2009.00646.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neve, M., Morgan, P. J., Jones, P. R., & Collins, C. E.
Affiliations
University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Neve, M.
Venue
Obesity Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-03-22
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
306-321
ISSN
  • 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-789X
OpenAlex
W2051999098
Cited by
459
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 31
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
online intervention, weight loss, weight maintenance, obesity, overweight adults, intervention attrition, body mass index
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Obesity, Patient Education as Topic, Research Design, Self Care, Weight Loss, Treatment Outcome, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review