Cited by 97Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareIndigenous Health and Education

Indigenous Birth Outcomes in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States - an Overview~!2010-01-14~!2010-04-16~!2010-07-06~!

Smylie, Janet, Crengle, Sue, Freemantle, Jane, Taualii, Maile·2010·The Open Women' s Health Journal

Abstract

Objective-To review Indigenous infant mortality, stillbirth, birth weight, and preterm birth outcomes in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States.Methods-Systematic searches of published literature and a review and assessment of existing perinatal surveillance systems were undertaken.Where possible, within country comparisons of Indigenous to non-Indigenous birth outcomes are included.Results-Indigenous/non-Indigenous infant mortality rate ratios range from 1.6 to 4.0.Stillbirth rates, where data are available, are also uniformly higher for Indigenous people.In all four countries, the disparities in Indigenous/non-Indigenous infant mortality rate ratios are most marked in the post-neonatal period.With few exceptions, the rates of leading causes of infant mortality are higher among Indigenous infants than non-Indigenous infants within all four countries.In most cases, rates of small for gestational age and preterm birth were also elevated for Indigenous compared to non-Indigenous infants.Conclusions-There are significant disparities in Indigenous/non-Indigenous birth outcomes in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States.These Indigenous/non-Indigenous birth outcome disparities fit the criteria for health inequities, as they are not only unnecessary and avoidable, but also unfair and unjust.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1874291201004020007

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Epidemiological information has significant impacts on studied populations as it is used to plan and evaluate health interventions or record health inequities compared to majority groups in national populations.

    “Furthermore, epidemiological information has significant impacts on studied populations as it is used to plan and evaluate health interventions or record health inequities compared to majority groups in national populations (Gracey & King, 2009; Smylie, Crengle, Freemantle, & Taualii, 2010).”

    From Addressing the need for indigenous and decolonized quantitative research methods in Canada (2021) · cites this paper as Smylie, Crengle, Freemantle, & Taualii, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smylie, J., Crengle, S., Freemantle, J., & Taualii, M.
Affiliations
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Papa Ola Lokahi (US)
Corresponding author
Smylie, Janet
Venue
The Open Women' s Health Journal
Published
2010-07-22
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
7-17
ISSN
1874-2912 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053573268
Cited by
97
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Open Women s Health Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Health and Education
Keywords
infant mortality, stillbirth, birth weight, preterm birth, small for gestational age, health disparities, perinatal surveillance, postneonatal mortality, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review