Indigenous Birth Outcomes in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States - an Overview~!2010-01-14~!2010-04-16~!2010-07-06~!
Abstract
Objective-To review Indigenous infant mortality, stillbirth, birth weight, and preterm birth outcomes in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States.Methods-Systematic searches of published literature and a review and assessment of existing perinatal surveillance systems were undertaken.Where possible, within country comparisons of Indigenous to non-Indigenous birth outcomes are included.Results-Indigenous/non-Indigenous infant mortality rate ratios range from 1.6 to 4.0.Stillbirth rates, where data are available, are also uniformly higher for Indigenous people.In all four countries, the disparities in Indigenous/non-Indigenous infant mortality rate ratios are most marked in the post-neonatal period.With few exceptions, the rates of leading causes of infant mortality are higher among Indigenous infants than non-Indigenous infants within all four countries.In most cases, rates of small for gestational age and preterm birth were also elevated for Indigenous compared to non-Indigenous infants.Conclusions-There are significant disparities in Indigenous/non-Indigenous birth outcomes in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States.These Indigenous/non-Indigenous birth outcome disparities fit the criteria for health inequities, as they are not only unnecessary and avoidable, but also unfair and unjust.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Epidemiological information has significant impacts on studied populations as it is used to plan and evaluate health interventions or record health inequities compared to majority groups in national populations.
“Furthermore, epidemiological information has significant impacts on studied populations as it is used to plan and evaluate health interventions or record health inequities compared to majority groups in national populations (Gracey & King, 2009; Smylie, Crengle, Freemantle, & Taualii, 2010).”
From Addressing the need for indigenous and decolonized quantitative research methods in Canada (2021) · cites this paper as Smylie, Crengle, Freemantle, & Taualii, 2010
Cites
The Concepts and Principles of Equity and Health
Whitehead, M. (1992) · International Journal of Health Services · doi:10.2190/986l-lhq6-2vte-yrrn · Cited by 2,284 · see citing works
Indigenous health part 1: Determinants and disease patterns
Gracey, M., & King, M. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60914-4 · Cited by 1,303 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Miller, S., Abalos, E., Chamillard, M., Ciapponi, A., Colaci, D., Comandé, D., Diaz, V., Geller, S., Hanson, C., Langer, A., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31472-6 · Cited by 1,181 · see citing works
Addressing the need for indigenous and decolonized quantitative research methods in Canada
Hayward, A., Wodtke, L., Craft, A., Robin, T., Smylie, J., McConkey, S., Nychuk, A., Healy, C., Star, L., & Cidro, J. (2021) · SSM - Population Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100899 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citationCritical epidemiology in action: Research for and by indigenous peoples
Prussing, E. (2018) · SSM - Population Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.09.003 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Long-distance travel for birthing among Indigenous and non-Indigenous pregnant people in Canada
Smylie, J., O’Brien, K., Beaudoin, E., Daoud, N., Bourgeois, C., George, E. H., Bebee, K., & Ryan, C. (2021) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.201903 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationAdcock, A., Cram, F., Edmonds, L., & Lawton, B. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18189835 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Adcock, A., Cram, F., Edmonds, L., & Lawton, B. (2023) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/10497323231164550 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Smylie, J., Crengle, S., Freemantle, J., & Taualii, M.
- Affiliations
- St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Papa Ola Lokahi (US)
- Corresponding author
- Smylie, Janet
- Venue
- The Open Women' s Health Journal
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2010-07-22
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 7-17
- ISSN
- 1874-2912 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053573268
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Open Women s Health Journal (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Health and Education
- Keywords
- infant mortality, stillbirth, birth weight, preterm birth, small for gestational age, health disparities, perinatal surveillance, postneonatal mortality, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review