Cited by 27Infant Development and Preterm CareIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

He tamariki kokoti tau: Families of indigenous infants talk about their experiences of preterm birth and neonatal intensive care

Open access
Adcock, Anna, Cram, Fiona, Edmonds, Liza, Lawton, Beverley·2021·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Māori (Indigenous peoples of Aotearoa New Zealand) bear an unequal burden of poor perinatal health outcomes, including preterm birth. An infant arriving preterm disrupts the birth imaginary of whānau (family collectives) and situates them in a foreign health environment that may not be culturally safe and nurturing. A cross-sectional interpretative phenomenological analysis of first interviews with 19 whānau participating in a Kaupapa Māori (by, with, for Māori) qualitative longitudinal study of preterm birth identified themes from their experiences and the meanings they attributed to them. Preterm birth was an emotional roller coaster, with the birth imaginary and anticipated roles disrupted as health practitioners took over the care of their infants. Whānau expressed the desire to be close to their infants, holding them, loving them, nurturing them, and emplacing them within whakapapa (genealogy, continual layering of foundations) networks. When health practitioners or hospital policies inhibited this intimacy by isolating, excluding, or discriminating, whānau were frustrated. Being familiar with hospital routines, staff, peers, infant cares, and being wrapped in wider whānau support were key for whānau coping. Whakawhanaungatanga (processes of establishing relationships) create safe spaces for whānau to be themselves. This quietens the 'storm' and returns whānau to a sense of calm, through the reclamation of their environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph18189835

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [4]PMMRC Fourteenth Annual Report of the Perinatal and Maternal Mortality Review Committee|Te Pūrongo ā-Tau Tekau Mā Whā o te Komiti Arotake Mate Pēpi, Mate Whaea Hoki: Reporting Mortality and Morbidity 2018|Te Tuku Pūrongo Mō te Mate me te Whakamate 2018 Health Quality & Safety Commission Wellington, New Zealand 2021
  2. [11]PMMRC Twelfth Annual Report of the Perinatal and Maternal Mortality Review Committee: Reporting Mortality and Morbidity 2016 Health Quality & Safety Commission New Zealand Wellington, New Zealand 2018
  3. [34]Whitty-Rogers J. Etowa J. Evans J. Becoming an Aboriginal mother: Childbirth experiences of women from one Mi’Kmaq community in Nova Scotia “Until Our Hearts Are on The Ground” Aboriginal Mothering, Oppression, Resistance and Rebirth Lavell-Harvard D.M. Lavell J.C. Demeter Press Toronto, ON, Canada 2006 25 33

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adcock, A., Cram, F., Edmonds, L., & Lawton, B.
Affiliations
  • Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
  • (Ngāti Pāhauwera) Katoa Ltd., Auckland 1143, New Zealand
  • Dunedin Public Hospital (NZ)
Corresponding author
Adcock, Anna
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-09-18
Volume
18
Issue
18
Pages
9835
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3201635156
Cited by
27
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Victoria University of Wellington
Funders
Health Research Council of New Zealand (16/444)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
preterm birth, neonatal intensive care, Māori families, whānau, cultural safety, infant holding, whakapapa, whakawhanaungatanga, family coping, Kaupapa Māori research, hospital discrimination
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Longitudinal Studies, Male, New Zealand, Pregnancy, Intensive Care, Neonatal, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, Premature Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review