Cited by 5Temporomandibular Joint DisordersPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPersonality Traits and Psychology

Personality Traits and Subjective Health Complaints in Female TMD Patients and Healthy Controls

Open access
Mohn, Christine, Vassend, Olav, Schie Krogstad, Berit, Knardahl, Stein·2010·The Open Pain Journal

Abstract

Background: Personality traits and general health complaints may influence the course of and treatment of chronic pain. However, only few studies compare more than one or two personality characteristics in chronic pain patients and healthy controls. This study compares the comprehensive non-pathological personality structure of female patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and pain-free controls. Moreover, this study controls for the influence of Neuroticism, self-presentation bias, and acute pain sensitivity on the subjective report of general health complaints. Methods: Twenty-five TMD patients were compared to 25 matched controls on personality traits (NEO Personality Inventory- Revised; NEO-PI-R), self-presentation bias (Social Desirability Scale; SDS), psychological distress (Symptom Checklist 90-Revised; SCL-90-R), and general somatic complaints. Experimental pain sensitivity was assessed by electrocutaneous and pressure pain stimulation.Results: Compared to the controls, Extraversion and Openness were lower in the TMD group, and the TMD patients exhibited higher levels of psychological and musculoskeletal complaints also when Neuroticism, self-presentation bias, and acute pain sensitivity were held constant.Conclusions: Low levels of Extraversion and Openness may dispose TMD patients to isolation and negative thought patterns.The elevated levels of psychological distress and general musculoskeletal pain in the TMD group add to previous reports of TMD as a complex condition also involving structures and processes outside of the orofacial region.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1876386301003010134

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most of the work is in populations suffering from long-term chronic pain such as fibromyalgia or non-specific LBP.

    “Most of the work is in populations suffering from long-term chronic pain such as fibromyalgia or non-specific LBP (Conversano et al., 2018;Mohn et al., 2010;Ramírez-Maestre et al., 2004).”

    From Beyond yellow flags: The Big‐Five personality traits and psychologically informed musculoskeletal rehabilitation. (2023) · cites this paper as Mohn et al., 2010

    The Introduction identifies this as a study of TMD patients, and the Discussion describes TMD as a chronic pain condition, so the paper is an example of work in a chronic-pain population. It does not establish that most work is in such populations, and its study population had TMD rather than fibromyalgia or non-specific low back pain. The indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. J Craniomandib Dis Facial Oral Pain 1992; 6: 301-55.
  2. Hassett AL, Cone JD, Patella SJ, Sigal LH. The role of catastrophizing in the pain and depression of women with fibromyalgia syndrome. Arhtritis Rheum 2000; 43: 2493-500.
  3. McBeth J, Macfarlane GJ, Benjamin S, Silman AJ. Features of somatization predict the onset of chronic widespread pain. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44: 940-6.
  4. Hedenberg-Magnusson B, Ernberg M, Kopp S. Presence of orofacial pain and temporomandibular disorder in fibromyalgia. Swed Dent J 1999; 23: 185-92.
  5. Dao TTT, LeResche L. Gender differences and pain. J Orofac Pain 2002; 14: 169-84.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mohn, C., Vassend, O., Schie Krogstad, B., & Knardahl, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • National Institute of Occupational Health (NO)
Corresponding author
Mohn, Christine
Venue
The Open Pain Journal
Published
2010-11-11
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
134-143
ISSN
1876-3863 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129414049
Cited by
5
References
60
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The Open Pain Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
temporomandibular disorders, personality traits, subjective health complaints, extraversion, openness to experience, neuroticism, self-presentation bias, psychological distress, musculoskeletal pain, experimental pain sensitivity, women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review