The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Engineered Bioretention for Removal of Nitrate from Stormwater Runoff
Abstract
A bioretention unit is a simple, plant‐ and soil‐based, low‐impact treatment and infiltration facility for treating stormwater runoff in developed areas. Nitrate, however, is not attenuated in conventional bioretention facilities. Thus, this study systematically evaluated a reengineered concept of bioretention for nitrate removal via microbial denitrification, which incorporates a continuously submerged anoxic zone with an overdrain. Experimental studies were performed in four phases. In the first two phases, column studies demonstrated that, overall, newspaper is the best solid‐phase electron‐donor substrate for denitrification out of the set studied (alfalfa, leaf mulch compost, newspaper, sawdust, wheat straw, wood chips, and elemental sulfur) based on superior nitrate removal and effluent water quality. The nitrate loading and hydraulic loading studies in the second phase provided design information. In the third phase, system viability after 30‐ and 84‐day dormant periods was evaluated in column studies, demonstrating that newspaper‐supported biological denitrification should be effective under conditions of intermittent loadings. Finally, in the fourth phase, pilot‐scale bioretention studies demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed design, showing nitrate plus nitrite mass removals of up to 80%. These results indicate that engineered bioretention for the removal of nitrogen from stormwater runoff has the potential for successful application as an urbanstormwater treatment practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nitrate removal from groundwater using a denitrification wall amended with sawdust: field trial
Schipper, L., & Vojvodić‐Vuković, M. (1998) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq1998.00472425002700030025x · Cited by 161
Cited by
Water Quality Improvement through Bioretention Media: Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal
Davis, A. P., Shokouhian, M., Sharma, H., & Minami, C. (2006) · Water Environment Research · doi:10.2175/106143005x94376 · Cited by 464
Self-citationVariation among plant species in pollutant removal from stormwater in biofiltration systems
Read, J., Wevill, T., Fletcher, T., & Deletic, A. (2008) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2007.08.036 · Cited by 322
Opportunities and challenges for managing nitrogen in urban stormwater: A review and synthesis
Collins, K. A., Lawrence, T. J., Stander, E. K., Jontos, R. J., Kaushal, S. S., Newcomer, T. A., Grimm, N. B., & Cole Ekberg, M. L. (2010) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.03.015 · Cited by 309
Hydraulic and pollutant removal performance of fine media stormwater filtration systems
Hatt, B. E., Fletcher, T. D., & Deletic, A. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es071264p · Cited by 291
Meeting hydrologic and water quality goals through targeted bioretention design
Hunt, W. F., Davis, A. P., & Traver, R. G. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000504 · Cited by 272
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, H., Seagren, E. A., & Davis, A. P.
- Venue
- Water Environment Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 355-367
- ISSN
- 0043-1303 (ISSN-L)
- 1061-4303
- 1554-7531
- OpenAlex
- W2182553790
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineered Bioretention for Removal of Nitrate from Stormwater Runoff. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2175/106143003x141169
- The paper
- Kim, H., Seagren, E. A., & Davis, A. P. (2003). Engineered Bioretention for Removal of Nitrate from Stormwater Runoff. Water Environment Research. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143003x141169
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.