The DOI matches its Crossref record.
14. Linguistic Third Spaces in Education: Teachers’ Translanguaging across the Bilingual Continuum
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A translanguaging pedagogical stance is not restricted to instructors who are multilingual.
“Flores and García (2013) remind educators that a translanguaging pedagogical stance is not restricted to instructors who are multilingual.”
From Translanguaging-as-Resource: University ESL Instructors' Language Orientations and Attitudes Toward Translanguaging (2019) · cites this paper as Flores and García (2013)
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Burton, J., & Rajendram, S. (2019) · TESL Canada Journal · doi:10.18806/tesl.v36i1.1301 · Cited by 79
Lang, N. W. (2019) · Bilingual Research Journal · doi:10.1080/15235882.2018.1561550 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Flores, N., & García, O.
- ORCID
- Flores, Nelson
- Venue
- Managing Diversity in Education
- Publisher
- Multilingual Matters
- Published
- 2013-12-31
- Pages
- 243-256
- OpenAlex
- W2802459110
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 10.07
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Multilingual Matters eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Channel View Publications eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- translanguaging, bilingual education, teachers, multilingual pedagogy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
