The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Can Threatened Languages be Saved?
Abstract
This book provides both practical case studies and theoretical directions from five continents and advances the collective pursuit of "reversing language shift" for the greater benefit of cultural democracy everywhere.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
"Expert Rhetorics" in Advocacy for Endangered Languages: Who Is Listening, and What Do They Hear?
Hill, J. H. (2002) · Journal of Linguistic Anthropology · doi:10.1525/jlin.2002.12.2.119 · Cited by 507
The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages
(1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511975981 · Cited by 332
Social factors in childhood bilingualism in the United States
PEARSON, B. Z. (2007) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s014271640707021x · Cited by 299
Counting the losses: numbers as the language of language endangerment
Moore, R. E., Pietikäinen, S., & Blommaert, J. (2010) · Sociolinguistic Studies · doi:10.1558/sols.v4i1.1 · Cited by 160
FREELAND, J. (2003) · Comparative Education · doi:10.1080/03050060302553 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Venue
- Multilingual Matters eBooks
- Publisher
- Multilingual Matters
- Published
- 2001-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4231567758
- Cited by
- 700
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.80
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Can Threatened Languages be Saved? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21832/9781853597060
- The paper
- Can Threatened Languages be Saved? (2001). Multilingual Matters eBooks. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853597060
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
