The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organizational Identity Orientation: Forging a Link between Organizational Identity and Organizations' Relations with Stakeholders
Abstract
To better understand the connection between organizational identity and how organizations relate to their stakeholders, this paper introduces the construct of identity orientation, previously applied at the individual-level of analysis, at the organizational-level of analysis and proposes that organizations have three distinct identity orientations: individualistic, relational, and collectivistic. In a field study using qualitative and quantitative methods and including 1,126 participants from 88 organizations in the legal services and non-alcoholic beverage industries, I assess the construct's viability, explore its properties, and analyze its predictors at multiple levels of analysis. Results reveal that organizations' relations with stakeholders constitute a prominent feature of organizational identity, that relations with external and internal stakeholders are perceived as tightly coupled, that both pure and hybrid identity orientation types are relatively common, and that identity orientation varies widely among business organizations. Further, specific organizational variables bearing on organizations' stakeholder relations appear to be stronger predictors of identity orientation than general organizational-level or individual-level variables. Implications for a range of literatures addressing organizations' external (stakeholder management, interorganizational relations) and internal relations (human resource management, psychological contracts) are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995
Bem, D. J. (1972) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6 · Cited by 5,241 · cited 1×
“Further, engaging in certain activities over time would also cause firms to change their own self-conceptions (Ashforth and Mael, 1996; see also Bem, 1972), producing further alignment between client type and firm identity, which should be reflected in members’ perceptions of identity…”
BackgroundThe self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts.
Triandis, H. C. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.506 · Cited by 5,019
Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations.
Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83 · Cited by 3,401 · cited 4×
“Each of these three identity orientations has powerful implications for individuals’ social motivations by cognitively focusing individuals on themselves, their relationship partners, and their social groups, respectively (Brewer and Gardner, 1996; Brickson, 2000a).”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Grant, A. M. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.108 · Cited by 1,114
Positive social interactions and the human body at work: Linking organizations and physiology
Heaphy, E. D., & Dutton, J. E. (2008) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2008.27749365 · Cited by 578
Does corporate social responsibility impact on employee engagement?
Ferreira, P., & Real de Oliveira, E. (2014) · Journal of Workplace Learning · doi:10.1108/jwl-09-2013-0070 · Cited by 174
What we talk about when we talk about stakeholders
Johnson-Cramer, M. E., Phillips, R. A., Fadlallah, H., Berman, S. L., & Elms, H. (2022) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/00076503211053005 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Brickson, S. L.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 576-609
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-3815
- OpenAlex
- W2117253740
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizational Identity Orientation: Forging a Link between Organizational Identity and Organizations' Relations with Stakeholders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2189/asqu.50.4.576
- The paper
- Brickson, S. L. (2005). Organizational Identity Orientation: Forging a Link between Organizational Identity and Organizations' Relations with Stakeholders. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.50.4.576
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.