Cited by 12Vector-borne infectious diseasesBartonella species infections researchVector-Borne Animal Diseases

Spatial distribution of vector borne disease agents in dogs in Aegean region, Turkey

Open access
Ural, Kerem, Gultekin, Mehmet, Atasoy, Abidin, Ulutas, Bulent·2014·Revista Mvz Córdoba

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjective. Assess the spatial distribution of seroprevalence of infection with or exposure to 4 vector-borne pathogens Ehrlichia canis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi and Dirofilaria immitis, across the coastal states of the Aegean region with special reference to clinical signs and haematological variances related to disease condition. Materials and methods. A convenience sample, targeting blood from at least 10 pet dogs from İzmir, Aydin, Denizli, Mugla and Manisa cities involved was evaluated using a canine point-of-care ELISA kit. Results. Out of 307 dogs tested the overall seroprevalence was highest for E. canis (24.42%), followed by E. canis + A. phagocytophilum co-infection (10.42%), A. phagocytophilum (7.49%) and D. immitis (2.28%). Only 2 cases were seropositive to B. burgdorferi albeit 10 dogs were co-infected with more than 2 agents. For both dogs infected with E. canis and co-infected with E. canis and A. phagocytophilum, anemia, thrombocytopenia and leukocytosis, were more commonly detected, whereas thrombocytopenia and leukocytosis were significant finding in dogs infected with A. phagocytophilum or D. immitis, respectively. Variance analysis showed significant differences for mean RBC, Hb, PCV and PLT values (p<0.01) among control group and other groups. Conclusions. Seropositivity for vector-borne pathogens other than B. burgdorferi, is moderately to widely distributed in dogs residing in the Aegean region in Turkey.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21897/rmvz.102

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Cyprus, studies from 2019 reported for the first time occurrence of D. immitis infections in dogs, with prevalence of 0.5 and 4.3%.

    “In Cyprus, studies from 2019 reported for the first time the occurrence of D. immitis infections in dogs in the country, reporting prevalence of 0.5 and 4.3% [101,102], respectively.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Skotarczak B. Canine Ehrlichiosis. Ann Agric Environ Med 2003; 10:137-141.
  2. Agaoglu Z, Akgul Y, Ceylan E, Akkan H. Van yöresi köpeklerinde Dirofilaria immitis'in yaygınlığı. YYU Vet Fak Derg 2000; 11(2):41-43.
  3. Balıkcı E, Sevgili M. Elazığ ve çevresindeki k ö p e k l e r d e D i r o f i l a r i a i m m i t i s ' i n seroprevalansı. Fırat Univ Sag Bil Vet Derg 2005; 19(2):103-106.
  4. Kose K. Erzincan Yöresindeki Köpeklerde Dirofilaria immitis'in Prevalansı Üzerine Araştırmalar. [Master Thesis]. Van, Turkey: University of Yuzuncu Yıl, Institute of Health Sciences; 2005.
  5. Taşçı GT. Kars Yöresi Köpeklerinde Dirofilariosis'in Yaygınlığı. [Master Thesis]. Kars, Turkey: University of Kafkas, Institute of Health Sciences; 2005.
  6. Voyvoda H, Paşa S, Ozensoy Toz S, Ozbel Y, Ertabaklar H. Aydın'ın bazı ilçe ve köyleri ile İzmir'in Selçuk ilçesindeki köpeklerde Leishmaniosis ve Diroflariosis'in prevalansı. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2004; 28:1105-1111.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ural, K., Gultekin, M., Atasoy, A., & Ulutas, B.
Affiliations
Adnan Menderes University (TR)
Venue
Revista Mvz Córdoba
Published
2014-05-04
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
4086-4098
ISSN
  • 0122-0268 (ISSN-L)
  • 1909-0544
OpenAlex
W1633307143
Cited by
12
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-sa
Locations
  • Revista Mvz Córdoba (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Revista Mvz Córdoba (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Bartonella species infections research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Vector-Borne Animal Diseases
Keywords
vector-borne diseases, dogs, seroprevalence, Ehrlichia canis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi, Dirofilaria immitis, co-infection, spatial distribution, hematological changes, thrombocytopenia, leukocytosis, anemia, Aegean region

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review