The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning Ecologies for Technological Fluency: Gender and Experience Differences
Abstract
The concern with a “digital divide” has been transformed from one defined by technological access to technological prowess—employing technologies for more empowered and generative uses such as learning and innovation. Participation in technological fluency-building activities among high school students in a community heavily involved in the technology industry was investigated in a study of 98 high school seniors enrolled in AP-level calculus. Findings indicated substantial variability in history of fluency-building experiences despite similar levels of access. More and less experienced groups were defined based on their breadth of prior experience. Males and females who were classified as more experienced utilized a broader range of learning resources and were more likely to learn from out-of-school classes and distributed resources such as online tutorials and reading material. Gender differences emerged with respect to participation in certain activities such as computer programming, even when controlling for overall breadth of experience and an analysis of course-taking history helped explain why. Four times as many males as females had taken a programming class. Analysis of reasons for taking courses indicated that the majority of females who chose to take programming did so with the encouragement of family members. Both confidence and interest were related to experience, though the relationship differed for males and females. These results are discussed with respect to a multi-context framework for the development of technological fluency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
Bloch, M., Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1994) · Man · doi:10.2307/2804509 · Cited by 39,454
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Dewey, J. (1986) · The Educational Forum · doi:10.1080/00131728609335764 · Cited by 13,432
Review of research in education
Shulman, L. S., Mowry, S., & Berliner, D. C. (1973) · F.E. Peacock eBooks · Cited by 7,754
Foxman, D., & Bateson, G. (1973) · The Western Political Quarterly · doi:10.2307/446833 · Cited by 7,225
Katuna, A., Dewey, J., Schneider, F., Dickerman, W., Stephan, A. S., Sorenson, H., & Hart, J. K. (1938) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2084758 · Cited by 6,905
Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535 · Cited by 6,447
A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures
The New London Group (1996) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u · Cited by 5,551
The cultural nature of human development
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-1244 · Cited by 5,250
Handbook of educational psychology
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3084 · Cited by 4,825
Cited by
Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000052 · Cited by 1,259
New Technology and Digital Worlds: Analyzing Evidence of Equity in Access, Use, and Outcomes
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x09349791 · Cited by 1,047
Interest and Self-Sustained Learning as Catalysts of Development: A Learning Ecology Perspective
Barron, B. (2006) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000094368 · Cited by 964
Self-citationGender divide and acceptance of collaborative Web 2.0 applications for learning in higher education
Huang, W.-H. D., Hood, D. W., & Yoo, S. J. (2013) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.02.001 · Cited by 287
A typology of young people's internet use: implications for education
Eynon, R., & Malmberg, L.-E. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.020 · Cited by 247
Metadata
- Authors
- Barron, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Computing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-36
- ISSN
- 0735-6331 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-4140
- OpenAlex
- W2153324540
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 20.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning Ecologies for Technological Fluency: Gender and Experience Differences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2190/1n20-vv12-4rb5-33va
- The paper
- Barron, B. (2004). Learning Ecologies for Technological Fluency: Gender and Experience Differences. Journal of Educational Computing Research. https://doi.org/10.2190/1n20-vv12-4rb5-33va
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.