Cited by 12Aging, Health, and DisabilityAging and Gerontology ResearchHealth disparities and outcomes

Self-Rated Activity Levels and Longevity: Evidence from a 20 Year Longitudinal Study

Mullee, Mark A., Coleman, Peter G., Briggs, Roger S. J., Stevenson, James E., Turnbull, Joanne C.·2008·The International Journal of Aging and Human Development

Abstract

The study reports on factors predicting the longevity of 328 people over the age of 65 drawn from an English city and followed over 20 years. Both the reported activities score and the individual's comparative evaluation of their own level of activity independently reduced the risk of death, even when health and cognitive status were taken into account. The analysis has provided a strong test of the relevance of measures of reported activity and measures of self-perception to longevity. The study confirms the important predictive role of reported activity levels even when detailed health measures are taken into account. But in addition personal perception of one's own relative level of activity, and to a lesser extent subjective assessment of health, also predicted longevity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2190/ag.67.2.d

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A second mediating factor was the value ascribed to or satisfaction found in activity or social participation, which was measured and noted for its role in several studies.

    “A second mediating factor, again broadly defined, was the value ascribed to or satisfaction found in activity or social participation, measured and noted for its role in several studies (Katz and Yelin 2001;Mullee et al. 2008 ;Neugebauer, Katz and Pasch 2003;Nimrod and Adoni 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mullee, M. A., Coleman, P. G., Briggs, R. S. J., Stevenson, J. E., & Turnbull, J. C.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Mullee, Mark A.
Venue
The International Journal of Aging and Human Development
Published
2008-07-09
Volume
67
Issue
2
Pages
171-186
ISSN
  • 0091-4150 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-3535
OpenAlex
W2006127453
Cited by
12
References
29
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The International Journal of Aging and Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
longevity, mortality prediction, older adults, subjective health assessment, physical activity, cognitive status, health status
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Female, Humans, Longevity, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Motor Activity, Predictive Value of Tests, Registries, Risk Factors, Proportional Hazards Models, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review