Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 302

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Comprehensive Assessment and Referral Evaluation (Care)—Rationale, Development and Reliability

Gurland, Barry, Kuriansky, Judith, Sharpe, Lawrence, Simon, Robert, Stiller, Pamela, Birkett, Peter·1978·The International Journal of Aging and Human Development

Abstract

The Comprehensive Assessment and Referral Evaluation (CARE) is a new assessment technique which is intended to reliably elicit, record, grade and classify information on the health and social problems of the older person. The CARE is basically a semi-structured interview guide and an inventory of defined ratings. It is designated comprehensive because it covers psychiatric, medical, nutritional, economic and social problems rather than the interests of only one professional discipline. The style, scope and scoring of the CARE makes it suitable for use with both patients and non-patients, and a potentially useful aid in determining whether an elderly person should be referred , and to whom, for a health or social service. The CARE can also be employed in evaluating the effectiveness of that service if given.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2190/cl3j-0e20-97xx-mv5l

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Post F., The Diagnostic Process, in Recent Developments in Psychogeriatrics: A Symposium, Kay D. W. K. and Walk A., (eds.), Headley Brothers, Ashford, Kent, 1971.
  2. Cooper J. E., Kendell R. E., Gurland B. J., Sharpe L., Copeland J. R. M. and Simon R. J., Psychiatric Diagnosis in New York and London: A Comparative Study of Mental Hospital Admissions, Maudsley Monograph, No. 20, Oxford University Press, London, 1972.
  3. 10.1016/0010-440X(70)90200-2 · doi:10.1016/0010-440x(70)90200-2
  4. Criteria Committee of the New York Heart Association, Inc., Nomenclature and Criteria for Diagnosis of Diseases of the Heart and Blood Vessels, N. Y. Heart Association, Inc., New York, 1953.
  5. McCartney J., Sorenson F. and Maurer J., A Comparison of a Self-Assessment Scale of Hearing Impairment and Selected Audiometric Data on a Geriatric Population, Project ARM (Auditory Rehabilitation Mobile), Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, 1973.
  6. Cornell Medical Index—Health Questionnaire, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1949.
  7. 10.1177/009141507600700408 · doi:10.1177/009141507600700408

Cited by

See all 302

Metadata

Authors
Gurland, B., Kuriansky, J., Sharpe, L., Simon, R., Stiller, P., & Birkett, P.
Venue
The International Journal of Aging and Human Development
Published
1978-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
9-42
ISSN
  • 0091-4150 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-3535
OpenAlex
W1984394815
Cited by
302
References
8
FWCI
5.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Comprehensive Assessment and Referral Evaluation (Care)—Rationale, Development and Reliability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2190/cl3j-0e20-97xx-mv5l
The paper
Gurland, B., Kuriansky, J., Sharpe, L., Simon, R., Stiller, P., & Birkett, P. (1978). The Comprehensive Assessment and Referral Evaluation (Care)—Rationale, Development and Reliability. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development. https://doi.org/10.2190/cl3j-0e20-97xx-mv5l

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.