CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 112Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Complicated Grief and the Quest for Meaning: A Constructivist Contribution

Neimeyer, Robert A.·2006·OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
DOI 10.2190/eql1-ln3v-knyr-18tf
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

One of the more important results of the upwelling of research on bereavement in recent decades has been the development of criteria for complicated grief, a disorder whose coherence, correlates and consequences have been subjected to increasing scrutiny. In this article I argue that clinical, conceptual, and evidence-based considerations converge to support the further refinement of such criteria, with a special emphasis on their connection to the protracted and painful quest for meaning that characterizes a subset of the bereaved. As further research supports and extends these current efforts, there is reason to believe that an understanding of complicated grief can make a significant contribution to research, theory, and practice concerning adaptation in the wake of loss.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2190/eql1-ln3v-knyr-18tf

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Attig T., 2000, The heart of grief
  2. Currier J., 2006, Violence
  3. Guidano V. F., 1991, The self in process
  4. Janoff-Bulman R., 2000, Loss and trauma
  5. Neimeyer R. A., 2004, On Series 1: Systems of psychotherapy [VHS video/DVD]
  6. 10.1080/07481180490461179 · DOI
  7. Neimeyer R. A., 2005, Late life widowhood in the United States
  8. Neimeyer R. A., 2002, Disenfranchised grief, 97
  9. Prigerson H., 2005, Omega, 49
  10. Silverman G. K., 2001, Israel Journal of Psychiatry, 38, 202
  11. Stroebe M., 2001, Handbook of bereavement research
  12. Worden J. W., 1991, Grief counseling and grief therapy: A handbook for mental health practitioners

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 112

Related

Metadata

Authors
Neimeyer, R. A.
Affiliations
University of Memphis (US)
Corresponding author
Neimeyer, Robert A.
ORCID
Neimeyer, Robert A.
Venue
OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2006-02
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
37-52
ISSN
  • 0030-2228 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-3764
DOI
10.2190/eql1-ln3v-knyr-18tf
OpenAlex
W2028227904
Cited by
109
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
complicated grief, bereavement, meaning-making, constructivism, diagnostic criteria, grief, adaptation to loss, death and dying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review