The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Definitional Distinctions in Response to Perinatal Loss and Fertility Barriers
Abstract
Women of childbearing age may face unanticipated perinatal losses and fertility barriers which challenge emotional well-being. However, the conceptual fit of perinatal and reproductive loss into contemporary grief theory is less well defined. This article utilizes secondary data from the National Survey of Fertility Barriers (NSFB) (Johnson & White, n.d.) to examine the definitional distinctions between depression, complicated grief, and personal growth. In the study ( N = 4,712), approximately one-third of participants (34%) had experienced a pregnancy loss, stillbirth, or infant/child death, while another one-third (33%) experienced some degree of fertility challenge other than miscarriage. Through descriptive multi-group comparisons and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), we explore definitional distinctions between these groups within constructs of depression, complicated grief, and personal growth. Study findings highlight the complex interrelationships among grief, depression, and personal growth which are interwoven with experiences of perinatal and infant death as well as fertility challenges.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is increasing evidence for associations between perinatal loss and common mental disorders including: depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress (PTS); all of which can develop in addition to the natural process of grieving (Adib-Rab et al., 2019; Gravensteen et al., 2012; Price & McLeod, 2012; Brier, 2004)”
From The mental health impact of perinatal loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Price & McLeod, 2012
Citations
Cites
(1995) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.152.1.22 · Cited by 736
Boelen, P. A., & van den Bout, J. (2005) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.11.2175 · Cited by 256
Affective disorders in the aftermath of miscarriage: A comprehensive review
Klier, C. M., Geller, P. A., & Ritsher, J. B. (2002) · Archives of Women's Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s00737-002-0146-2 · Cited by 176
Grief and Depression After Miscarriage: Their Separation, Antecedents, and Course
Beutel, M., Deckardt, R., von Rad, M., & Weiner, H. (1995) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-199511000-00003 · Cited by 140 · cited 3×
“sion (Beutel, von Rad, & Weiner, 1995; Klier, Geller, & Ritsher, 2002), anxiety (Geller, Kerns, & Klier, 2004), posttraumatic stress disorder (Engelhard, 2004), as well as general grief (Beutel et al., 1995; Vance, Boyle, Najman, & Thearle, 2002).”
BackgroundCouple distress after sudden infant or perinatal death: A 30‐month follow up
Vance, J., Boyle, F., Najman, J., & Thearle, M. (2002) · Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health · doi:10.1046/j.1440-1754.2002.00008.x · Cited by 105
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- American Psychiatric Association (APA)., 2000, Diagnostic and statistical manual
- 10.1093/humrep/dem046 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.grf.0000129920.38874.0d · DOI
- 10.1097/YCO.0b013e328340b594 · DOI
- First M., 2011, Medscape Today
- 10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00042-4 · DOI
- 10.1080/07481180290088338 · DOI
- 10.2190/GX7H-H05N-A4DN-RLU9 · DOI
- Horowitz M., 1997, American Journal of Psychiatry, 1, 904
- 10.1093/oso/9780195313048.001.0001 · DOI
- Johnson D. R., National Survey of Fertility Barriers [Computer File]. Population Research Institute [distributor]
- 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07111757 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15328007sem1104_2 · DOI
- Muthen L. K., 2010, MPlus
- National Survey of Fertility Barriers (NSFB)., 2009, Methodology report for wave 1
- 10.1007/s10995-006-0123-x · DOI
- 10.1093/sw/53.4.367 · DOI
- 10.2190/ANKH-BB2H-D52N-X99Y · DOI
- Thorn P., 2009, International Journal of Fertility and Sterility, 3, 48
- Wright P., 2010, Pushing on: A grounded theory study of maternal perinatal bereavement
- 10.1017/S0033291707009865 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The mental health impact of perinatal loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Herbert, D., Young, K., Pietrusińska, M., & MacBeth, A. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.026 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Price, S. K., & McLeod, D. A.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Price, Sarah Kye
- Venue
- Illness, Crisis & Loss
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 255-273
- ISSN
- 1054-1373 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6968
- OpenAlex
- W2331447206
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Illness Crisis & Loss (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Pennsylvania
- University of Nebraska-Lincoln
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Keywords
- perinatal loss, complicated grief, depression, personal growth, miscarriage, stillbirth, infant death, grief theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review