The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thrust into Technology: How Veteran Teachers Respond
Abstract
This two-year study explored the perceptions and roles of experienced elementary teachers, who were computer novices, as they learned and began using computer technology in their teaching. The research questions guiding this study focused on incentives and barriers to learning and using computer technology, professional development approaches, and teaching roles indicated by traditional and constructivist characteristics. The researchers employed qualitative research methods within a case study framework. Data obtained through a variety of sources were coded and analyzed within- and across-cases. Results indicated participants' preferences for learning basic computer skills before integrating technology into the curricula, the importance of seeing purpose in using computers in teaching, and having concrete and grade-specific integration ideas. Also, first-order or extrinsic incentives motivated participants before second-order or intrinsic incentives, while first-order barriers tended to mask second-order barriers. Using technology seemed to foster more constructivist role indicators in at least one participant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration
Ertmer, P. A. (1999) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02299597 · Cited by 2,189
Self-citation
Cited by
Teacher Technology Change: How Knowledge, Confidence, Beliefs, and Culture Intersect
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551 · Cited by 2,556
Self-citationMultimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review
Abdulrahaman, M. D., Faruk, N., Oloyede, A. A., Surajudeen-Bakinde, N. T., Olawoyin, L. A., Mejabi, O. V., Imam-Fulani, Y. O., Fahm, A. O., & Azeez, A. L. (2020) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312 · Cited by 631
Challenges and Solutions when Using Technologies in the Classroom
Johnson, A. M., Jacovina, M. E., Russell, D. G., & Soto, C. M. (2016) · Adaptive Educational Technologies for Literacy Instruction · doi:10.4324/9781315647500-2 · Cited by 363
Chocarro, R., Cortiñas, M., & Marcos-Matás, G. (2023) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03055698.2020.1850426 · Cited by 343
Metadata
- Authors
- Snoeyink, R., & Ertmer, P. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Technology Systems
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-111
- ISSN
- 0047-2395 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-3810
- OpenAlex
- W2096294317
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thrust into Technology: How Veteran Teachers Respond. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2190/ydl7-xh09-rlj6-mtp1
- The paper
- Snoeyink, R., & Ertmer, P. A. (2001). Thrust into Technology: How Veteran Teachers Respond. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. https://doi.org/10.2190/ydl7-xh09-rlj6-mtp1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.