Cited by 41Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsSchizophrenia research and treatment

A Smartphone App to Foster Power in the Everyday Management of Living With Schizophrenia: Qualitative Analysis of Young Adults’ Perspectives

Open access
Terp, Malene, Jørgensen, Rikke, Laursen, Birgitte Schantz, Mainz, Jan, Bjørnes, Charlotte D·2018·JMIR Mental Health

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Literature indicates that using smartphone technology is a feasible way of empowering young adults recently diagnosed with schizophrenia to manage everyday living with their illness. The perspective of young adults on this matter, however, is unexplored. Objective: This study aimed at exploring how young adults recently diagnosed with schizophrenia used and perceived a smartphone app (MindFrame) as a tool to foster power in the everyday management of living with their illness. Methods: Using participatory design thinking and methods, MindFrame was iteratively developed. MindFrame consists of a smartphone app that allows young adults to access resources to aid their self-management. The app is affiliated with a website to support collaboration with their health care providers (HCPs). From January to December 2016, community-dwelling young adults with a recent diagnosis of schizophrenia were invited to use MindFrame as part of their care. They customized the resources while assessing their health on a daily basis. Then, they were invited to evaluate the use and provide their perspective on the app. The evaluation was qualitative, and data were generated from in-depth interviews. Data were analyzed using a hermeneutical approach. Results: A total of 98 individuals were eligible for the study (mean age 24.8, range 18-36). Of these, 27 used MindFrame and 13 participated in the evaluation. The analysis showed that to the young adults, MindFrame served to foster power in their everyday management of living with schizophrenia. When MindFrame was used with the HCPs consistently for more than a month, it could provide them with the power to keep up their medication, to keep a step ahead of their illness, and to get appropriate help based on their needs. This empowered them to stay on track with their illness, thus in control of it. It was also reported that MindFrame could fuel the fear of restraint and illness exacerbation, thereby disempowering some from feeling certain and secure. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that young adults diagnosed with schizophrenia are amenable to use a smartphone app to monitor their health, manage their medication, and stay alert of the early signs of illness exacerbation. This may empower them to stay on track with their illness, thus in control of it. This indicates the potential of smartphone-based care being capable of aiding this specific population to more confidently manage their new life situation. The potentially disempowering aspect of MindFrame accentuates a need for further research to understand the best uptake and the limitations of smartphone-based schizophrenia care of young adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/10157

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exacerbation of symptoms negatively impacted engagement.

    “whereas exacerbation of symptoms negatively impacted engagement [49,93,104,200].”

    From Barriers to and facilitators of user engagement with digital mental health interventions: Systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [200]

    In Results, “Use of MindFrame” (page unavailable), clinicians said they had not invited 20 individuals because they were concerned those individuals were too ill to use and engage with the app. This supports a link between illness and potential engagement, but it does not establish that symptom exacerbation actually reduced engagement among app users. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [30]Polit DF Beck CT Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice - 9th Edition 2011 Philadelphia Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
  2. [34]Simonsen J Robertson TJ Participatory design: an introduction Routledge Handbook of Participatory Design 2013 Hoboken Taylor and Francis 1 17
  3. [36]Brandt E Binder T Sanders EB Simonsen J Robertson T Tools and techniques. Ways to engage telling, making and enacting Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, Edition 1 2013 Hoboken Routledge International Handbooks 145 81
  4. [38]Kensing F Methods and Practices in Participatory Design 2003 Copenhagen ITU Press
  5. [47]Kvale S Brinkmann S InterViews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing 2nd edition 2009 Los Angeles Sage Publications
  6. [49]Gadamer HG Truth and Method Revised Edition 2013 London Bloomsbury Academic

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Terp, M., Jørgensen, R., Laursen, B. S., Mainz, J., & Bjørnes, C. D.
Affiliations
Aalborg University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Terp, Malene
Venue
JMIR Mental Health
Published
2018-10-01
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
e10157
ISSN
2368-7959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2889798650
Cited by
41
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4
FWCI
4.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
TrygFonden
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
schizophrenia, young adults, mobile application, self-management, empowerment, illness management, medication adherence, health monitoring, patient-provider partnership, digital mental health, user perspective

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review