Cited by 63Information Systems Theories and ImplementationTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationElectronic Health Records Systems

Infrastructure revisited: an ethnographic case study of how health information infrastructure shapes and constrains technological innovation

Open access
Greenhalgh, Trisha, Wherton, Joseph, Shaw, Sara, Papoutsi, Chrysanthi, Vijayaraghavan, Shanti, Stones, Rob·2019·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Star defined infrastructure as something other things “run on”; it consists mainly of “boring things.” Building on her classic 1999 paper, and acknowledging contemporary developments in technologies, services, and systems, we developed a new theorization of health information infrastructure with five defining characteristics: (1) a material scaffolding, backgrounded when working and foregrounded upon breakdown; (2) embedded, relational, and emergent; (3) collectively learned, known, and practiced (through technologically-supported cooperative work and organizational routines); (4) patchworked (incrementally built and fixed) and path-dependent (influenced by technical and socio-cultural legacies); and (5) institutionally supported and sustained (eg, embodying standards negotiated and overseen by regulatory and professional bodies). Objective: Our theoretical objective was, in a health care context, to explore what information infrastructure is and how it shapes, supports, and constrains technological innovation. Our empirical objective was to examine the challenges of implementing and scaling up video consultation services. Methods: In this naturalistic case study, we collected a total of 450 hours of ethnographic observations, over 100 interviews, and about 100 local and national documents over 54 months. Sensitized by the characteristics of infrastructure, we sought examples of infrastructural challenges that had slowed implementation and scale-up. We arranged data thematically to gain familiarity before undertaking an analysis informed by strong structuration, neo-institutional, and social practice theories, together with elements taken from the actor-network theory. Results: We documented scale-up challenges at three different sites in our original case study, all of which relate to “boring things”: the selection of a platform to support video-mediated consultations, the replacement of desktop computers with virtual desktop infrastructure profiles, and problems with call quality. In a fourth subcase, configuration issues with licensed video-conferencing software limited the spread of the innovation to another UK site. In all four subcases, several features of infrastructure were evident, including: (1) intricacy and lack of dependability of the installed base; (2) interdependencies of technologies, processes, and routines, such that a fix for one problem generated problems elsewhere in the system; (3) the inertia of established routines; (4) the constraining (and, occasionally, enabling) effect of legacy systems; and (5) delays and conflicts relating to clinical quality and safety standards. Conclusions: Innovators and change agents who wish to introduce new technologies in health services and systems should: (1) attend to materiality (eg, expect bugs and breakdowns, and prioritize basic dependability over advanced functionality); (2) take a systemic and relational view of technologies (versus as an isolated tool or function); (3) remember that technology-supported work is cooperative and embedded in organizational routines, which are further embedded in other routines; (4) innovate incrementally, taking account of technological and socio-cultural legacies; (5) consider standards but also where these standards come from and what priorities and interests they represent; and (6) seek to create leeway for these standards to be adapted to different local conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/16093

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Infrastructure also includes human elements, shared understandings and historical path-dependencies, and the regulatory and professional standards.

    “Infrastructure also includes human elements (e.g., organizational roles, routines, and relationships), shared understandings and historical path-dependencies (such as legacy technologies and commercial contracts), and the regulatory and professional standards noted above (27, 37).”
  • The few detailed real-world studies suggest that efforts to implement remote consultation services even without an ongoing pandemic are logistically complex, resource-intensive and often stymied by technical and regulatory challenges.

    “The few detailed real-world studies in the literature suggest that efforts to implement remote consultation services even without an ongoing pandemic are logistically complex, resource-intensive and often stymied by technical and regulatory challenges (18, 26, 27, 115, 117, 118)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [10]Shaw S Wherton J Vijayaraghavan S Morris J Bhattacharya S Hanson P Campbell-Richards D Ramoutar S Collard A Hodkinson I Greenhalgh T Advantages and limitations of virtual online consultations in a NHS acute trust: the VOCAL mixed-methods study Health Services and Delivery Research 2018 6 6 21 2050 4537 29939519 29939519
  2. [28]Scott W Institutions and organizations, 3rd edition 2012 Thousand Oaks, CA Sage
  3. [34]Clover B Health Service Journal 2017 11 29 2019-12-14 Cyberattack costs trust £9.5m in lost income https://www.hsj.co.uk/barts-health-nhs-trust/cyberattack-costs-trust-95m-in-lost-income/7021176.article
  4. [53]Ellingsen G Monteiro E Seamless Integration: Standardisation across Multiple Local Settings Comput Supported Coop Work 2006 12 12 15 5-6 443 466 10.1007/s10606-006-9033-0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Shaw, S., Papoutsi, C., Vijayaraghavan, S., & Stones, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Barts Health NHS Trust (GB)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
Corresponding author
Greenhalgh, Trisha
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2019-12-19
Volume
21
Issue
12
Pages
e16093
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995436283
Cited by
63
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6
FWCI
13.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (WT104830MA, 104830/Z/14/Z)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (HS&DR-13/59/26, 13/59/26)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
health information infrastructure, technological innovation, video consultation, telemedicine, scale-up challenges, legacy systems, path dependence, organizational routines, platform selection, virtual desktop infrastructure, call quality, social practice theory, new institutionalism, strong structuration theory, actor-network theory, clinical decision support
MeSH terms
Anthropology, Cultural, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Models, Theoretical, Telemedicine, Inventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review