Cited by 235Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Development and Clinical Evaluation of a Web-Based Upper Limb Home Rehabilitation System Using a Smartwatch and Machine Learning Model for Chronic Stroke Survivors: Prospective Comparative Study

Open access
Chae, Sang Hoon, Kim, Yushin, Lee, Kyoung-Soub, Park, Hyung-Soon·2020·JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent advancements in wearable sensor technology have shown the feasibility of remote physical therapy at home. In particular, the current COVID-19 pandemic has revealed the need and opportunity of internet-based wearable technology in future health care systems. Previous research has shown the feasibility of human activity recognition technologies for monitoring rehabilitation activities in home environments; however, few comprehensive studies ranging from development to clinical evaluation exist. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) develop a home-based rehabilitation (HBR) system that can recognize and record the type and frequency of rehabilitation exercises conducted by the user using a smartwatch and smartphone app equipped with a machine learning (ML) algorithm and (2) evaluate the efficacy of the home-based rehabilitation system through a prospective comparative study with chronic stroke survivors. METHODS: The HBR system involves an off-the-shelf smartwatch, a smartphone, and custom-developed apps. A convolutional neural network was used to train the ML algorithm for detecting home exercises. To determine the most accurate way for detecting the type of home exercise, we compared accuracy results with the data sets of personal or total data and accelerometer, gyroscope, or accelerometer combined with gyroscope data. From March 2018 to February 2019, we conducted a clinical study with two groups of stroke survivors. In total, 17 and 6 participants were enrolled for statistical analysis in the HBR group and control group, respectively. To measure clinical outcomes, we performed the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity, grip power test, Beck Depression Inventory, and range of motion (ROM) assessment of the shoulder joint at 0, 6, and 12 months, and at a follow-up assessment 6 weeks after retrieving the HBR system. RESULTS: The ML model created with personal data involving accelerometer combined with gyroscope data (5590/5601, 99.80%) was the most accurate compared with accelerometer (5496/5601, 98.13%) or gyroscope data (5381/5601, 96.07%). In the comparative study, the drop-out rates in the control and HBR groups were 40% (4/10) and 22% (5/22) at 12 weeks and 100% (10/10) and 45% (10/22) at 18 weeks, respectively. The HBR group (n=17) showed a significant improvement in the mean WMFT score (P=.02) and ROM of flexion (P=.004) and internal rotation (P=.001). The control group (n=6) showed a significant change only in shoulder internal rotation (P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that a home care system using a commercial smartwatch and ML model can facilitate participation in home training and improve the functional score of the WMFT and shoulder ROM of flexion and internal rotation in the treatment of patients with chronic stroke. This strategy can possibly be a cost-effective tool for the home care treatment of stroke survivors in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service KCT0004818; https://tinyurl.com/y92w978t.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/17216

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [20]Miyoshi H Kimura Y Tamura T Sekine M Okabe I Hara K Smart Living - Home Rehabilitation Training System Using an Interactive Television 2015 6th European Conference of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering September 7-11, 2014 Dubrovnik, Croatia 661 665
  2. [27]Singh D Human Activity Recognition Using Recurrent Neural Networks Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction 2017 International Cross-Domain Conference for Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction 29 August-1 September Reggio, Italy 267 274
  3. [48]Holden A McNaney R Balaam M Thompson R Hammerla N Ploetz T CueS: cueing for upper limb rehabilitation in stroke 2015 British HCI 2015: 2015 British Human Computer Interaction Conference July 2015 Lincoln Lincolnshire, United Kingdom
  4. [49]Singh D Users’ Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Smart Home Technologies 2018 16th International Conference, ICOST 2018 July 10-12, 2018 Singapore

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chae, S. H., Kim, Y., Lee, K.-S., & Park, H.-S.
Affiliations
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Cheongju University (KR)
Corresponding author
Park, Hyung-Soon
Venue
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Published
2020-07-09
Volume
8
Issue
7
Pages
e17216
ISSN
2291-5222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3024384408
Cited by
235
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 1
FWCI
15.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
home-based rehabilitation, chronic stroke, upper limb rehabilitation, smartwatches, wearable sensors, activity recognition, exercise detection, convolutional neural networks, remote physical therapy, mobile application, stroke survivors, motor recovery, depression, patient dropout, telemedicine, COVID-19 pandemic, Wolf Motor Function Test, Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity
MeSH terms
Telerehabilitation, Machine Learning, Stroke Rehabilitation, Wearable Electronic Devices, Aged, Chronic Disease, Exercise Therapy, Home Care Services, Humans, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Survivors, Internet, Stroke, Upper Extremity, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review