Cited by 11Biomedical Text Mining and OntologiesMedical Coding and Health InformationMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Characterizing Chronic Pain Episodes in Clinical Text at Two Health Care Systems: Comprehensive Annotation and Corpus Analysis

Open access
Carlson, Luke A, Jeffery, Molly M, Fu, Sunyang, He, Huan, McCoy, Rozalina G, Wang, Yanshan, Hooten, William Michael, St Sauver, Jennifer +2 more·2020·JMIR Medical Informatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Chronic pain affects more than 20% of adults in the United States and is associated with substantial physical, mental, and social burden. Clinical text contains rich information about chronic pain, but no systematic appraisal has been performed to assess the electronic health record (EHR) narratives for these patients. A formal content analysis of the unstructured EHR data can inform clinical practice and research in chronic pain. Objective: We characterized individual episodes of chronic pain by annotating and analyzing EHR notes for a stratified cohort of adults with known chronic pain. Methods: We used the Rochester Epidemiology Project infrastructure to screen all residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, for evidence of chronic pain, between January 1, 2005, and September 30, 2015. Diagnosis codes were used to assemble a cohort of 6586 chronic pain patients; people with cancer were excluded. The records of an age- and sex-stratified random sample of 62 patients from the cohort were annotated using an iteratively developed guideline. The annotated concepts included date, location, severity, causes, effects on quality of life, diagnostic procedures, medications, and other treatment modalities. Results: A total of 94 chronic pain episodes from 62 distinct patients were identified by reviewing 3272 clinical notes. Documentation was written by clinicians across a wide spectrum of specialties. Most patients (40/62, 65%) had 1 pain episode during the study period. Interannotator agreement ranged from 0.78 to 1.00 across the annotated concepts. Some pain-related concepts (eg, body location) had 100% (94/94) coverage among all the episodes, while others had moderate coverage (eg, effects on quality of life) (55/94, 59%). Back pain and leg pain were the most common types of chronic pain in the annotated cohort. Musculoskeletal issues like arthritis were annotated as the most common causes. Opioids were the most commonly captured medication, while physical and occupational therapies were the most common nonpharmacological treatments. Conclusions: We systematically annotated chronic pain episodes in clinical text. The rich content analysis results revealed complexity of the chronic pain episodes and of their management, as well as the challenges in extracting pertinent information, even for humans. Despite the pilot study nature of the work, the annotation guideline and corpus should be able to serve as informative references for other institutions with shared interest in chronic pain research using EHRs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/18659

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The corpus from study34 characterized chronic pain episodes in adult patients receiving treatment at Mayo Clinic and the Olmsted Medical Center, comprising 62 adults with noncancer chronic pain.

    “For our fourth dataset we utilized a subset of the corpus from a study34 that characterized chronic pain episodes in adult patients receiving treatment at Mayo Clinic and the Olmsted Medical Center. An annotated corpus of 62 adults experiencing noncancer chronic pain was created using chronic pain ICD code for the anchor diagnosis and retrieving all the patient’s clinical notes 6 months before and”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [13]Stubbs A MAE and MAI: Lightweight annotation and adjudication tools Proceedings of the 5th Linguistic Annotation Workshop 2011 The 5th Linguistic Annotation Workshop June 23-24, 2011 Portland, OR Stroudsburg, PA Association for Computational Linguistics 129 133

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carlson, L. A., Jeffery, M. M., Fu, S., He, H., McCoy, R. G., Wang, Y., Hooten, W. M., St Sauver, J., Liu, H., & Fan, J.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Fan, Jungwei
Venue
JMIR Medical Informatics
Published
2020-11-16
Volume
8
Issue
11
Pages
e18659
ISSN
2291-9694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3094522459
Cited by
11
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Medical Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (U01TR002062, UL1TR002377)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
chronic pain, clinical text annotation, electronic health records, unstructured clinical notes, annotation guidelines, inter-annotator agreement, pain intensity, quality of life, opioids, non-pharmacological treatment, back pain, leg pain, musculoskeletal pain, arthritis, Rochester Epidemiology Project

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review