Cited by 108Human Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisPhysical Activity and HealthCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

Wearable Activity Trackers for Monitoring Adherence to Home Confinement During the COVID-19 Pandemic Worldwide: Data Aggregation and Analysis

Open access
Pépin, Jean Louis, Bruno, Rosa Maria, Yang, Rui-Yi, Vercamer, Vincent, Jouhaud, Paul, Escourrou, Pierre, Boutouyrie, Pierre·2020·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: In the context of home confinement during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, objective, real-time data are needed to assess populations’ adherence to home confinement to adapt policies and control measures accordingly. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether wearable activity trackers could provide information regarding users' adherence to home confinement policies because of their capacity for seamless and continuous monitoring of individuals’ natural activity patterns regardless of their location. Methods: We analyzed big data from individuals using activity trackers (Withings) that count the wearer’s average daily number of steps in a number of representative nations that adopted different modalities of restriction of citizens’ activities. Results: Data on the number of steps per day from over 740,000 individuals around the world were analyzed. We demonstrate the physical activity patterns in several representative countries with total, partial, or no home confinement. The decrease in steps per day in regions with strict total home confinement ranged from 25% to 54%. Partial lockdown (characterized by social distancing measures such as school closures, bar and restaurant closures, and cancellation of public meetings but without strict home confinement) does not appear to have a significant impact on people’s activity compared to the pre-pandemic period. The absolute level of physical activity under total home confinement in European countries is around twofold that in China. In some countries, such as France and Spain, physical activity started to gradually decrease even before official commitment to lockdown as a result of initial less stringent restriction orders or self-quarantine. However, physical activity began to increase again in the last 2 weeks, suggesting a decrease in compliance with confinement orders. Conclusions: Aggregate analysis of activity tracker data with the potential for daily updates can provide information regarding adherence to home confinement policies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/19787

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The second largest study was a European study comprising 742,000 participants (6.85%).

    “The largest study we identified was conducted in 2019 in North America and included over 8 million participants (75.71%) [153]; the second largest was a European study comprising 742,000 participants (6.85%) [162].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pépin, J. L., Bruno, R. M., Yang, R.-Y., Vercamer, V., Jouhaud, P., Escourrou, P., & Boutouyrie, P.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Withings (France) (FR)
  • Université Paris-Saclay (FR)
Corresponding author
Pépin, Jean Louis
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2020-06-19
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
e19787
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3033845731
Cited by
108
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 11
FWCI
20.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Université Grenoble Alpes (ANR-19-P3IA-0003, ANR-15-IDEX-02)
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-19-P3IA-0003, ANR-12-TECS-0010, IDEX-02, ANR‐15‐IDEX‐02, ANR‐19, ANR-12)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
wearable activity trackers, home confinement, COVID-19 lockdown, physical activity, step count, social distancing, partial lockdown, self-quarantine, policy adherence, school closures
MeSH terms
Fitness Trackers, Betacoronavirus, Data Aggregation, Data Analysis, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Europe, Female, France, Humans, Locomotion, Male, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Viral, Social Isolation, Spain, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review