Cited by 28Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCognitive Functions and MemoryTechnology Use by Older Adults

Efficacy of Smart Speaker–Based Metamemory Training in Older Adults: Case-Control Cohort Study

Open access
Kim, Jeongsim, Shin, EunJi, Han, KyungHwa, Park, Soowon, Youn, Jung Hae, Jin, Guixiang, Lee, Jun-Young·2021·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Metamemory training (MMT) is a useful training strategy for improving cognitive functioning in the older adult population. Despite the advantages, there are limitations imposed by location and time constraints. Objective: This study aimed to develop a smart speaker–based MMT program and evaluate the efficacy of the program in older adults without cognitive impairment. Methods: This study used a case-control cohort design. The smart speaker–based MMT program comprised 3 training sessions per day, 5 days a week, for 8 weeks. Each training session took approximately 15 minutes. This program was implemented using smart speakers, not human trainers. All participants completed the Mini-Mental State Examination, Subjective Memory Complaints Questionnaire, Verbal Learning Test, Digit Span Test, fluency tests, and a short-form version of the Geriatric Depression Scale before and after training. Results: A total of 60 subjects (29 in the MMT group and 31 in the control group) participated in the study. The training group showed significant increases in the delayed free recall, digit span forward, digit span backward, and fluency test scores compared with the control group. Conclusions: This study confirmed the efficacy of smart speaker–based MMT in older adults. Home-based smart speaker–based MMT is not limited with respect to location or constrained by space and may help older adults with subjective cognitive decline without requiring intervention by human professionals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/20177

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several barriers were identified when using smart speakers, including a lack of technological competency and difficulties issuing commands.

    “Several barriers were identified when using smart speakers, including a lack of technological competency and difficulties issuing commands [30].”

    From Smart Speakers for Health and Well-Being of Older Adults: A Mixed-Methods Review (2025) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes unfamiliarity with technology as a difficulty with computers and robots, but presents smart speakers as easier for older adults to use. In Results > Focus Group Interviews (page unavailable), users likewise report that smart speakers were easier and less burdensome than computers or phones. The paper does not identify difficulty issuing commands as a smart-speaker barrier. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mental health outcomes were mixed, as depression scores increased in both healthcare app and smart speaker groups after six months, with no significant differences between them.

    “Mental health outcomes were similarly mixed, as depression scores increased in both healthcare app and smart speaker groups after six months, with no significant differences between them [30].”

    From Smart Speakers for Health and Well-Being of Older Adults: A Mixed-Methods Review (2025) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Methods describe an eight-week smart-speaker training program, not a six-month comparison with a healthcare-app group. The Results compare the training group with a control group and refer to improvement, rather than an increase, in depressive symptoms; they do not report the claimed between-group depression result. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Smart speaker-based metamemory training improved memory and attention scores in older adults.

    “Programs such as smart speaker–based metamemory training have improved memory and attention scores [30].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]Oord AVD Dieleman S Zen H Simonyan K Vinyals O Graves A Kalchbrenner N Senior A Kavukcuoglu K WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audio Based on PixelCNN Architecture arXiv 2016 2016 9 19 13 15

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, J., Shin, E., Han, K., Park, S., Youn, J. H., Jin, G., & Lee, J.-Y.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • CHA University (KR)
  • Kyonggi University (KR)
Corresponding author
Lee, Jun-Young
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2021-02-16
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
e20177
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3120923181
Cited by
28
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
smart speakers, older adults, subjective memory complaints, cognitive decline, verbal learning, digit span, fluency
MeSH terms
Metacognition, Artificial Intelligence, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Teaching, Cohort Studies, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review