Cited by 697Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Virtual reality social cognition training for young adults with high-functioning autism

Open access
Kandalaft, Michelle R., Didehbani, Nyaz, Krawczyk, Daniel C., Allen, Tandra T., Chapman, Sandra B.·2013·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Few evidence-based social interventions exist for young adults with high-functioning autism, many of whom encounter significant challenges during the transition into adulthood. The current study investigated the feasibility of an engaging Virtual Reality Social Cognition Training intervention focused on enhancing social skills, social cognition, and social functioning. Eight young adults diagnosed with high-functioning autism completed 10 sessions across 5 weeks. Significant increases on social cognitive measures of theory of mind and emotion recognition, as well as in real life social and occupational functioning were found post-training. These findings suggest that the virtual reality platform is a promising tool for improving social skills, cognition, and functioning in autism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-012-1544-6

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some patients may prefer interacting with an AI carebot rather than a human care provider as care seekers would feel less anxious when discussing intimate private issues with a carebot.

    “Some patients may therefore prefer interacting with an AI carebot rather than a human care provider as care seekers would feel less anxious when discussing intimate private issues with a carebot (Kandalaft et al., 2013).”

    From SHIFTing artificial intelligence to be responsible in healthcare: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as Kandalaft et al., 2013

  • Humanized AI applications such as AI carebots can be immune to the personal biases that human therapists may have and thus their consultations may result in a more detached, objective point of view.

    “In addition, humanized AI applications such as AI carebots can be immune to the personal biases that human therapists may have and thus their consultations may result in a more detached, objective point of view.”

    From SHIFTing artificial intelligence to be responsible in healthcare: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as Kandalaft et al., 2013

  • Some patients may prefer interacting with an AI carebot rather than a human care provider.

    “Some patients may therefore prefer interacting with an AI carebot rather than a human care provider as care seekers would feel less anxious when discussing intimate private issues with a carebot (Kandalaft et al., 2013).”

    From SHIFTing artificial intelligence to be responsible in healthcare: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as Kandalaft et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Advanced clinical soultions for WAIS-IV and WMS-IV 2009 San Antonio Pearson

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kandalaft, M. R., Didehbani, N., Krawczyk, D. C., Allen, T. T., & Chapman, S. B.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
Corresponding author
Kandalaft, Michelle R.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2012-05-09
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
34-44
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2046201394
Cited by
697
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 1
FWCI
11.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
high-functioning autism, virtual reality, social cognition training, social skills, theory of mind, emotion recognition, young adults, coming of age, social functioning, occupational functioning, feasibility
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Autistic Disorder, Cognition, Humans, Social Adjustment, Social Behavior, Social Perception, User-Computer Interface, Treatment Outcome, Asperger Syndrome, Young Adult, Emotional Intelligence, Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review