Cited by 23Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesEmotion and Mood RecognitionMental Health via Writing

Validation of Visual and Auditory Digital Markers of Suicidality in Acutely Suicidal Psychiatric Inpatients: Proof-of-Concept Study

Open access
Galatzer-Levy, Isaac, Abbas, Anzar, Ries, Anja, Homan, Stephanie, Sels, Laura, Koesmahargyo, Vidya, Yadav, Vijay, Colla, Michael +5 more·2021·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Multiple symptoms of suicide risk have been assessed based on visual and auditory information, including flattened affect, reduced movement, and slowed speech. Objective quantification of such symptomatology from novel data sources can increase the sensitivity, scalability, and timeliness of suicide risk assessment. Objective: We aimed to examine measurements extracted from video interviews using open-source deep learning algorithms to quantify facial, vocal, and movement behaviors in relation to suicide risk severity in recently admitted patients following a suicide attempt. Methods: We utilized video to quantify facial, vocal, and movement markers associated with mood, emotion, and motor functioning from a structured clinical conversation in 20 patients admitted to a psychiatric hospital following a suicide risk attempt. Measures were calculated using open-source deep learning algorithms for processing facial expressivity, head movement, and vocal characteristics. Derived digital measures of flattened affect, reduced movement, and slowed speech were compared to suicide risk with the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation controlling for age and sex, using multiple linear regression. Results: Suicide severity was associated with multiple visual and auditory markers, including speech prevalence (β=−0.68, P=.02, r2=0.40), overall expressivity (β=−0.46, P=.10, r2=0.27), and head movement measured as head pitch variability (β=−1.24, P=.006, r2=0.48) and head yaw variability (β=−0.54, P=.06, r2=0.32). Conclusions: Digital measurements of facial affect, movement, and speech prevalence demonstrated strong effect sizes and linear associations with the severity of suicidal ideation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/25199

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Altered speech and vocality, reduced facial expressivity and movement have been found in major depressive disorder.

    “Notably, altered speech and vocality, reduced facial expressivity and movement have been found in major depressive disorder and psychopharmacological treatment has demonstrated restored levels of digital markers (e.g. increased head movement) and a decrease in anger and fear facial expressions [37, 38].”

    From Effectiveness of a scalable, remotely delivered stepped-care intervention to reduce symptoms of psychological distress among Polish migrant workers in the Netherlands: study protocol for the RESPOND randomised controlled trial (2023) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Results sections report that less speech, facial activity, and head movement were associated with greater suicidal ideation in psychiatric inpatients. The Methods identify participants by admission after a suicide attempt or with suicidal ideation, not by major depressive disorder; the paper therefore does not establish these findings specifically for people with MDD. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Psychopharmacological treatment has demonstrated restored levels of digital markers and a decrease in anger and fear facial expressions.

    “Notably, altered speech and vocality, reduced facial expressivity and movement have been found in major depressive disorder and psychopharmacological treatment has demonstrated restored levels of digital markers (e.g. increased head movement) and a decrease in anger and fear facial expressions [37, 38].”

    From Effectiveness of a scalable, remotely delivered stepped-care intervention to reduce symptoms of psychological distress among Polish migrant workers in the Netherlands: study protocol for the RESPOND randomised controlled trial (2023) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Methods and Results examine digital markers in relation to suicide severity, not changes after psychopharmacological treatment. The Discussion describes measuring treatment response as a future possibility, while the Facial Activity results report no significant association for fear or anger expressivity. Our copy therefore does not establish treatment-related restoration of markers or decreases in those expressions. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [8]Diefendorf AR Kraepelin E Clinical psychiatry: A textbook for students and physicians, abstracted and adapted from the 7th German edition of Kraepelin's Lehrbuch der Psychiatrie 1907 New York, NY MacMillan Co
  2. [40]Insel TR Digital phenotyping: a global tool for psychiatry World Psychiatry 2018 10 17 3 276 277 10.1002/wps.20550 10.1002/wps.20550 30192103 30192103 PMC6127813 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galatzer-Levy, I., Abbas, A., Ries, A., Homan, S., Sels, L., Koesmahargyo, V., Yadav, V., Colla, M., Scheerer, H., Vetter, S., Seifritz, E., Scholz, U., & Kleim, B.
Affiliations
  • AiCure (United States) (US)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Koesmahargyo, Vidya
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2021-06-03
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
e25199
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3136471953
Cited by
23
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6
FWCI
2.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
suicide risk assessment, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, psychiatric inpatients, facial expressivity, head movement, speech features, video interviews, deep learning, digital markers
MeSH terms
Emotions, Humans, Inpatients, Risk Factors, Suicide, Suicide, Attempted, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review