Cited by 199Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Understanding Engagement Strategies in Digital Interventions for Mental Health Promotion: Scoping Review

Open access
Saleem, Maham, Kühne, Lisa, De Santis, Karina Karolina, Christianson, Lara, Brand, Tilman, Busse, Heide·2021·JMIR Mental Health

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Digital interventions offer a solution to address the high demand for mental health promotion, especially when facing physical contact restrictions or lacking accessibility. Engagement with digital interventions is critical for their effectiveness; however, retaining users’ engagement throughout the intervention is challenging. It remains unclear what strategies facilitate engagement with digital interventions that target mental health promotion. Objective: Our aim is to conduct a scoping review to investigate user engagement strategies and methods to evaluate engagement with digital interventions that target mental health promotion in adults. Methods: This scoping review adheres to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for scoping reviews. The search was conducted in 7 electronic databases from inception to April 2020. The inclusion criteria for studies were as follows: adult (aged ≥18 years) users of digital interventions for mental health promotion from the general population; any digital intervention for mental health promotion; and user engagement strategies described in the intervention design. We extracted the following data items: study characteristics, digital intervention (type and engagement strategy), evaluation of engagement strategy (method and result specifying whether the strategy was effective at facilitating engagement), and features of engagement (extent of use and subjective experience of users). Results: A total of 2766 studies were identified, of which 16 (0.58%) met the inclusion criteria. The 16 studies included randomized controlled trials (6/16, 37%), studies analyzing process data (5/16, 31%), observational studies (3/16, 19%), and qualitative studies (2/16, 13%). The digital interventions for mental health promotion were either web based (12/16, 75%) or mobile app based (4/16, 25%). The engagement strategies included personalized feedback about intervention content or users’ mental health status; guidance regarding content and progress through e-coaching; social forums, and interactivity with peers; content gamification; reminders; and flexibility and ease of use. These engagement strategies were deemed effective based on qualitative user feedback or responses on questionnaires or tools (4/16, 25%), usability data (5/16, 31%), or both (7/16, 44%). Most studies identified personalized support in the form of e-coaching, peer support through a social platform, personalized feedback, or joint videoconference sessions as an engaging feature. Conclusions: Personalized support during the intervention, access to social support, and personalized feedback seem to promote engagement with digital interventions for mental health promotion. These findings need to be interpreted with caution because the included studies were heterogeneous, had small sample sizes, and typically did not address engagement as the primary outcome. Despite the importance of user engagement for the effectiveness of digital interventions, this field has not yet received much attention. Further research is needed on the effectiveness of different strategies required to facilitate user engagement in digital interventions for mental health promotion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/30000

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent reviews on engagement with digital mental health interventions [40,41] identified that tailored digital technologies with personalized videos and avatars increased user engagement and demonstrated effectiveness.

    “Likewise, recent reviews on engagement with digital mental health interventions [40,41] identified that tailored digital technologies with personalized videos and avatars increased user engagement and demonstrated effectiveness.”

    From A Digital Tool (Technology-Assisted Problem Management Plus) for Lay Health Workers to Address Common Mental Health Disorders: Co-production and Usability Study in Pakistan (2025) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Results (Randomized Controlled Trials; page not available) report that avatar personalization improved task-specific engagement, and the Discussion says tailored content can increase engagement. The review mentions videos, but does not identify personalized videos as an effective engagement feature or demonstrate that the specified features improved mental health outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • User-centered design processes are increasingly incorporated to attain direction and input from users across all stages of DMHI design and development.

    “User-centered design processes are increasingly incorporated to attain direction and input from users across all stages of DMHI design and development”

    From A text messaging intervention to support the mental health of young adults: User engagement and feedback from a field trial of an intervention prototype (2023) · cites this paper as Saleem et al., 2021

    The Results section on recommended engagement strategies says the review used usability data and user feedback to identify effective strategies, while the Discussion describes tailoring interventions to users’ needs. Neither passage addresses whether user-centered design processes are increasingly incorporated or whether users provide input across all stages of DMHI design and development. Searches for user-centered and participatory design, development stages, and user input found no passage establishing that claim; the indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Various features, functionality, and design considerations can promote user engagement with DMHIs, including perceived usefulness, positive impact and relevance, content promoting health and social connection, design aspects, personalized content and choice, data security and privacy, and therapist guidance.

    “Reviews of the existing literature also show that various features, functionality, and design considerations can promote user engagement with DMHIs.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saleem, M., Kühne, L., De Santis, K. K., Christianson, L., Brand, T., & Busse, H.
Affiliations
Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS (DE)
Corresponding author
Saleem, Maham
Venue
JMIR Mental Health
Published
2021-12-20
Volume
8
Issue
12
Pages
e30000
ISSN
2368-7959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3195929293
Cited by
199
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 5
FWCI
3.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
user engagement, digital interventions, mental health promotion, e-coaching, personalized feedback, gamification, peer support, social support, mobile health apps, online intervention, engagement evaluation, usability, user experience, adults, COVID-19 restrictions, access to mental health care, videoconferencing, reminders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review