Cited by 19Infection Control in HealthcareMedical Device Sterilization and DisinfectionInfection Control and Ventilation

Disinfection of Virtual Reality Devices in Health Care Settings: In Vitro Assessment and Survey Study

Open access
Roberts, Scott C, Havill, Nancy L, Flores, Rosa M, Hendrix II, Curtis Anthony, Williams, Maximillian J, Feinn, Richard S, Choi, Steven J, Martinello, Richard A +2 more·2022·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

Background: Virtual reality (VR) devices are increasingly used in health care settings. The use among patients has the potential to unintentionally transmit pathogens between patients and hospital staff. No standard operating procedure for disinfection exists to ensure safe use between patients. Objective: This study aims to determine the efficacy of disinfectants on VR devices in order to ensure safe use in health care settings. Methods: Three types of bacteria were inoculated onto porous and nonporous surfaces of 2 VR devices: the Meta Oculus Quest and Meta Oculus Quest 2. Disinfection was performed using either isopropyl alcohol or alcohol-free quaternary ammonium wipes. A quantitative culture was used to assess the adequacy of disinfection. A survey was separately sent out to VR device technicians at other pediatric health care institutes to compare the methods of disinfection and how they were established. Results: Both products achieved adequate disinfection of the treated surfaces; however, a greater log-kill was achieved on nonporous surfaces than on the porous surfaces. Alcohol performed better than quaternary ammonium on porous surfaces. The survey respondents reported a wide variability in disinfection processes with only 1 person reporting an established standard operating procedure. Conclusions: Disinfection can be achieved through the use of either isopropyl alcohol or quaternary ammonium products. Porous surfaces showed lesser log-kill rates than the nonporous surfaces, indicating that the use of an added barrier may be of benefit and should be a point of future research. Given the variability in the disinfection process across health care systems, a standard operating procedure is proposed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/42332

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Effective disinfection of nonporous surfaces of VR equipment has been demonstrated using either 70% isopropyl alcohol or alcohol-free quaternary ammonium wipes.

    “Effective disinfection of nonporous surfaces of VR equipment has been demonstrated using either 70% isopropyl alcohol or alcohol-free quaternary ammonium wipes; however, any EPA-registered disinfectant with kill claims as permitted by the facility can be considered. 8,11”
  • Previous assessments of cleaning and disinfection of XR equipment reported that local infection control experts were not involved in performing risk assessments.

    “Previous assessments of the cleaning and disinfection of XR equipment have reported that local infection control (IC) experts were not involved in performing risk assessments and that standard operating procedures for the cleaning and disinfection of XR equipment were absent. 8”
  • Previous assessments of cleaning and disinfection of XR equipment reported that standard operating procedures for cleaning and disinfection of XR equipment were absent.

    “Previous assessments of the cleaning and disinfection of XR equipment have reported that local infection control (IC) experts were not involved in performing risk assessments and that standard operating procedures for the cleaning and disinfection of XR equipment were absent. 8”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roberts, S. C., Havill, N. L., Flores, R. M., Hendrix II, C. A., Williams, M. J., Feinn, R. S., Choi, S. J., Martinello, R. A., Marks, A. M., & Murray, T. S.
Affiliations
  • Yale New Haven Hospital (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Quinnipiac University (US)
Corresponding author
Roberts, Scott C
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2022-12-01
Volume
24
Issue
12
Pages
e42332
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4306720352
Cited by
19
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
Keywords
virtual reality devices, disinfection, infection control, isopropanol, quaternary ammonium compounds, porous surfaces, non-porous surfaces, cross-contamination, standard operating procedures, pediatric health care, hospital staff
MeSH terms
Virtual Reality, Ethanol, Child, Delivery of Health Care, Disinfection, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, 2-Propanol, Ammonium Compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review