Cited by 189Cancer survivorship and careVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsPediatric Pain Management Techniques

Virtual Reality: A Distraction Intervention for Chemotherapy

Open access
Schneider, Susan M., Hood, Linda E.·2007·Oncology Nursing Forum

Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To explore virtual reality (VR) as a distraction intervention to relieve symptom distress in adults receiving chemotherapy treatments for breast, colon, and lung cancer. DESIGN: Crossover design in which participants served as their own control. SETTING: Outpatient clinic at a comprehensive cancer center in the southeastern United States. SAMPLE: 123 adults receiving initial chemotherapy treatments. METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to receive the VR distraction intervention during one chemotherapy treatment and then received no intervention (control) during an alternate matched chemotherapy treatment. The Adapted Symptom Distress Scale-2, Revised Piper Fatigue Scale, and State Anxiety Inventory were used to measure symptom distress. The Presence Questionnaire and an open-ended questionnaire were used to evaluate the subjects' VR experience. The influence of type of cancer, age, and gender on symptom outcomes was explored. Mixed models were used to test for differences in levels of symptom distress. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Virtual reality and symptom distress. FINDINGS: Patients had an altered perception of time (p < 0.001) when using VR, which validates the distracting capacity of the intervention. Evaluation of the intervention indicated that patients believed the head-mounted device was easy to use, they experienced no cyber-sickness, and 82% would use VR again. However, analysis demonstrated no significant differences in symptom distress immediately or two days following chemotherapy treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Patients stated that using VR made the treatment seem shorter and that chemotherapy treatments with VR were better than treatments without the distraction intervention. However, positive experiences did not result in a decrease in symptom distress. The findings support the idea that using VR can help to make chemotherapy treatments more tolerable, but clinicians should not assume that use of VR will improve chemotherapy-related symptoms. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Patients found using VR during chemotherapy treatments to be enjoyable. VR is a feasible and cost-effective distraction intervention to implement in the clinical setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1188/07.onf.39-46

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Arthur C. Did reality move for you? New Scientist. 1992;134:22–27. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gross SW. The impact of a nursing intervention of relaxation with guided imagery on breast cancer patients’ stress and health as expanded consciousness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation; University of Texas at Austin: 1995. [Google Scholar]
  3. Macquart-Moulin G, Viens P, Genre D, Bouscary ML, Resbeut M, Gravis G, et al. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy for patients with nonmetastatic breast carcinoma: Side effects, quality of life, and organization. Cancer. 1999;85:2190–2199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF. POMS: Manual for Profile of Mood States. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service; 1971. [Google Scholar]
  5. Rizzo AA, Wiederhold BK. Applications and issues for the use of virtual reality technology for cognitive/behavioral/neuro-psychological assessment and intervention; Workshop presented at the 34th Annual Convention of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy; New Orleans, LA. 2000. Nov, [Google Scholar]
  6. Schneider SM. Effects of virtual reality on symptom distress in children receiving cancer chemotherapy. Dissertation Abstracts International:Science and Engineering. 1998;59(5B):2126. [Google Scholar]
  7. Spielberger CD. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press; 1983. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schneider, S. M., & Hood, L. E.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Venue
Oncology Nursing Forum
Published
2007-01-01
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
39-46
ISSN
  • 0190-535X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-0688
OpenAlex
W2086042012
Cited by
189
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Oncology nursing forum (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (P20NR007795)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
virtual reality, chemotherapy, symptom distress, fatigue, anxiety, breast cancer, colon cancer, lung cancer, head-mounted devices, cybersickness, treatment tolerability, time perception
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Breast Neoplasms, Colonic Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, User-Computer Interface

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review