Cited by 65Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Clinical accuracy of large language models and Google search responses to postpartum depression questions: cross-sectional study

Open access
Sezgin, Emre, Chekeni, Faraaz, Lee, Jennifer, Keim, Sarah·2023·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

UNSTRUCTURED —

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/49240

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On average, ChatGPT responses were rated at near ceiling for clinical accuracy, scoring 3.93 out of a possible 4.

    “on average, ChatGPT responses were rated at near ceiling for clinical accuracy, scoring a 3.93 out of a possible 4”
  • Board-certified human physicians rated ChatGPT responses as more in line with ACOG responses than Bard or Google Search responses.

    “Board-certified human physicians rated ChatGPT responses as more in line with ACOG responses than Bard or Google Search responses”
  • Bard's accuracy ratings were impacted by Bard's policy to advise consulting a health care provider when asked questions about mental health.

    “Bard’s accuracy ratings were impacted by Bard’s policy to advise consulting a health care provider when asked questions about mental health.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]Aronson S Lieu TW Scirica BM Getting generative AI right NEJM Catalyst 2023 1 10.1056/CAT.23.0063 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sezgin, E., Chekeni, F., Lee, J., & Keim, S.
Affiliations
Nationwide Children's Hospital (US)
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2023-09-11
Volume
25
Pages
e49240
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386304195
Cited by
65
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 7
FWCI
16.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
postpartum depression, large language models, clinical accuracy, diagnostic accuracy, maternal mental health, online health information
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Depression, Postpartum, Search Engine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review