Cited by 4Diabetes Management and EducationIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effectiveness of the Pasifika Women’s Diabetes Wellness Program (PWDWP): Protocol for a Pilot Intervention and Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes poses public health challenges for Māori and Pasifika communities in Australia. The women of these communities face a greater burden from type 2 diabetes–related mortality and comorbidities. Lifestyle modification behaviors through previous women’s wellness programs have been shown to reduce the risk of developing complications in established type 2 diabetes. The Pasifika Women’s Diabetes Wellness Program (PWDWP) pilot study, co-designed with Māori and Pasifika communities, was aimed at addressing late hospital presentations from diabetes-related complications. Objective: This study (1) examines the efficacy of women with type 2 diabetes in the intervention group for improved glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) clinical levels and diabetes self-management compared with the control group from baseline (T0) to week 12 (T1) and week 24 (T2; postintervention) and (2) assesses the cultural adaptability, acceptability, and feasibility of the pilot intervention for future studies. Methods: This study uses a quasiexperimental design that involves a 24-week intervention. We recruited 50 Māori and Pasifika women with type 2 diabetes (25 in the intervention group from the south side of Brisbane and 25 in the control group from the north side of Brisbane) using participatory talanoa methodologies. The intervention group participated in face-to-face and virtual whānau education workshops (5 weeks) and had access to individual coaching and virtual support delivered by trained Māori and Pasifika health professionals and community health workers. The control group received usual care with their identified health provider. Both groups received copies of the PWDWP journal, fact sheets, and a health check passbook with tailored motivational text messages. An advisory committee was set up to oversee the program implementation, including protocols of engagement, health checks, and data collection in community settings. The quantitative data were collected at T0, T1, and T2 with HbA1c as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes measured changes in diabetes self-care and body composition (eg, BMI, waist circumference). Qualitative data will ascertain the program’s feasibility and cultural adaptability using talanoa focus groups. Results: This pilot study was approved by the Queensland University of Technology Human Ethic Research Committee (5609) and began in January 2023 after participant recruitment between July 2022 and December 2022. The final data collection including the health check, focus group, and survey data was completed in November 2023, and data analysis and reporting are expected to conclude in 2024. Conclusions: This study provides a blueprint for PWDWP. Collaborative partnerships with community organizations and stakeholders are crucial for program success and suggest a potential model for targeting diabetes management for Māori and Pasifika communities, emphasizing the need for culturally relevant interventions. The findings will have significant implications for policymakers and practitioners when developing and implementing public health initiatives, particularly for communities with unique cultural nuances. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12622001100785p; https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=384470&isReview=true International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/55435

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/55435

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. International Diabetes FederationIDF Diabetes Atlas 2021International Diabetes Federation20212023-07-03https://diabetesatlas.org/atlas/tenth-edition/
  2. 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109119 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1007/s11606-009-1241-0 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.jcte.2016.03.001 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.024 · DOI
  6. 10.1186/s12889-017-4807-5 · DOI
  7. 10.2174/1573399813666170621123227 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/s2468-2667(18)30111-7 · DOI
  9. Colagiuri, S, 2017, Diabetes Mellitus in Developing Countries and Underserved Communities, 151, 10.1007/978-3-319-41559-8_9 · DOI
  10. 10.1186/s12939-019-1110-3 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.02.008 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108654 · DOI
  13. 10.13140/RG.2.2.18798.05440? · DOI
  14. 10.1111/ijcp.13392 · DOI
  15. 10.1353/CPR.2022.0011 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/hsc.13580 · DOI
  17. 10.1177/11771801231196777 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/hpja.329 · DOI
  19. 10.2337/diacare.23.7.943 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1177/0145721709335006 · DOI
  21. 10.1371/journal.pone.0187139 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1056/NEJMoa1611179 · DOI
  23. 10.1056/NEJMsa1616035 · DOI
  24. 10.1177/0145721715624968 · DOI
  25. Pallant, J, 2013, SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS, 5th edition
  26. 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108000 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/s2214-109x(20)30412-5 · DOI
  28. 10.1080/1177083x.2021.1876743 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/hpja.438 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Akbar, H., Contor, M., Niumata, W., Anderson, D., & Gallegos, D.
Affiliations
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Queensland Health (AU)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Akbar, Heena
Venue
JMIR Research Protocols
Published
2024-03-11
Volume
13
Pages
e55435
ISSN
1929-0748 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391293727
Cited by
4
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Research Protocols (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Diabetes Australia
  • Queensland University of Technology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, Māori women, culturally tailored interventions, community health workers, diabetes self-management, HbA1c, body composition, diabetes complications, co-design, talanoa, feasibility, cultural adaptability, Indigenous health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review