The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effectiveness of Therapeutic Exercise Interventions With Virtual Reality on Balance and Walking Among Persons With Chronic Stroke: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Well-targeted balance, walking, and weight-shift training can improve balance capabilities in the chronic phase of stroke. There is an urgent need for a long-term approach to rehabilitation that extends beyond the acute and subacute phases, supporting participation without increasing the demand for health care staff. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic exercise interventions with virtual reality (VR) training on balance and walking at the activity and participation levels in individuals with chronic stroke, compared with control groups receiving no treatment, conventional physical therapy, specific training, similar treatment, or identical treatment without VR. Methods: Studies were searched across 6 databases. The inclusion criteria were as follows: Adults aged 18 years or older with a stroke diagnosis for at least 6 months (population). Therapeutic exercises within a VR environment, using VR glasses or interactive games (intervention). Control groups without the use of VR (including no treatment, conventional physical therapy, specific training, similar treatment without VR, or identical treatment without the additional use of VR; comparison). We evaluated the Berg Balance Scale score, Functional Reach Test performance, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale score, Six-minute Walk Test, Two-minute Walk Test, 10-meter Walk Test results, and cadence (outcome measures). We investigated randomized controlled trials (study design). A meta-analysis and a meta-regression analysis were conducted to evaluate whether the content of VR interventions or control groups, as well as the level of VR immersion used, was related to balance or walking outcomes. Results: A total of 43 randomized controlled trials involving 1136 participants were included in this review. The use of VR training in therapeutic exercise interventions had a large effect on balance (standardized mean difference 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.72; P<.001) and a moderate effect on walking (standardized mean difference 0.31, 95% CI 0.09-0.53; P=.006) in individuals with chronic stroke, compared with pooled control groups (no treatment, conventional physical therapy, specific training, similar treatment, or identical treatment without the use of VR). According to the meta-regression findings, the content of VR interventions (P=.52), the type of control groups (P=.79), and the level of VR immersion (P=.82) were not significantly related to the pooled balance or walking outcomes. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) was moderate for balance and low for walking. Conclusions: Therapeutic exercise training with VR had a positive, albeit moderate, effect on balance and a low impact on walking at the level of activity (capacity), even in the chronic phase of stroke, without serious side effects. The results are applicable to working-aged stroke rehabilitees who are able to walk without assistance. Further research is needed with defined VR methods and outcomes that assess performance at the level of real-life participation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283
Feigin, V. L., Forouzanfar, M. H., Krishnamurthi, R., Mensah, G. A., Connor, M., Bennett, D. A., Moran, A. E., Sacco, R. L., Anderson, L., Truelsen, T., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61953-4 · Cited by 3,899 · cited 1×
“Although age-adjusted stroke mortality has decreased worldwide, the absolute number of stroke survivors and the overall burden of stroke—including incidence, prevalence, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years—remain high and have increased over the years in low-and middle-income countries [5].”
Chan, A.-W., Hróbjartsson, A., Haahr, M. T., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Altman, D. G. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.291.20.2457 · Cited by 1,845
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
Dwan, K., Altman, D. G., Arnaiz, J. A., Bloom, J., Chan, A.-W., Cronin, E., Decullier, E., Easterbrook, P. J., Von Elm, E., Gamble, C., et al. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003081 · Cited by 1,546
Virtual Environments for Motor Rehabilitation: Review
Holden, M. K. (2005) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2005.8.187 · Cited by 1,154
Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation
Laver, K. E., Lange, B., George, S., Deutsch, J. E., Saposnik, G., & Crotty, M. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008349.pub4 · Cited by 800
Lohse, K. R., Hilderman, C. G. E., Cheung, K. L., Tatla, S., & Van der Loos, H. F. M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093318 · Cited by 501
Is clinical virtual reality ready for primetime?
Rizzo, A. “., & Koenig, S. T. (2017) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000405 · Cited by 372 · cited 3×
“In all levels of immersion, the experience can be enhanced using a combination of visual, auditory, tactile, and motion-sensory inputs [16,21].”
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 101
- 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30962-x · DOI
- 10.1159/000352050 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.lpm.2016.11.007 · DOI
- 10.1177/1747493016676285 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.01.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.12.026 · DOI
- 10.1080/09638288.2021.1900418 · DOI
- 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013839 · DOI
- 10.3109/09638289709166530 · DOI
- 10.1155/2014/594540 · DOI
- 10.1177/0018720820904229 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.401 · DOI
- 10.1310/tsr1402-52 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12984-016-0124-y · DOI
- 10.1145/166117.166134 · DOI
- Ma, M, 2011, Advanced Computational Intelligence Paradigms in Healthcare 6. Virtual Reality in Psychotherapy, Rehabilitation, and Assessment, 169
- 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31325-3 · DOI
- 10.3109/17518423.2010.535805 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.06.010 · DOI
- Rintala, A, 2017, Etäteknologian Vaikuttavuus Liikunnallisessa Kuntoutuksessa: Järjestelmällinen Kirjallisuuskatsaus Ja Meta-Analyysi
- 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.11.007 · DOI
- 10.1155/2016/7309272 · DOI
- 10.1080/10749357.2016.1183349 · DOI
- 10.1080/10749357.2016.1250373 · DOI
- 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0062 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.05.017 · DOI
- 10.1177/0269215515593611 · DOI
- 10.2196/24111 · DOI
- 10.1080/10749357.2016.1192361 · DOI
- 10.1155/2019/7595639 · DOI
- 10.1109/vr.2019.8797828 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · DOI · Paper page
- Systematic Review ToolCovidence2020-01-05https://www.covidence.org
- O'Connor, D, 2011, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 5.1.0)
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.023 · DOI
- 10.1080/09638288.2022.2140844 · DOI
- 10.4103/1673-5374.156977 · DOI
- 10.1037/0090-5550.46.3.296 · DOI
- Higgins, J, 2011, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 5.1.0)
- 10.1016/j.hkpj.2014.04.002 · DOI
- Deeks, J, 2011, Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 5.1.0)
- 10.1136/bmj.d4002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02168.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.18637/jss.v036.i03 · DOI · Paper page
- Fleiss, JL, 1981, Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions (2nd ed.)
- 10.1097/phm.0b013e31828cd5d3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.09.003 · DOI
- 10.1620/tjem.228.69 · DOI
- 10.1089/g4h.2017.0126 · DOI
- 10.1589/jpts.24.1133 · DOI
- 10.1589/jpts.23.859 · DOI
- 10.1589/jpts.27.3693 · DOI
- 10.1589/jpts.27.655 · DOI
- 10.1589/jpts.24.755 · DOI
- 10.1080/00222895.2019.1574259 · DOI
- 10.1589/jpts.27.1883 · DOI
- 10.1589/jpts.27.2175 · DOI
- 10.12965/jer.130066 · DOI
- 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000447 · DOI
- 10.1589/jpts.27.2057 · DOI
- 10.1589/jpts.27.845 · DOI
- 10.1166/jno.2016.1875 · DOI
- 10.1177/0269215515584382 · DOI
- 10.12659/msm.898157 · DOI
- 10.1177/0269215511419383 · DOI
- 10.1589/jpts.28.2596 · DOI
- 10.1589/jpts.24.901 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.019 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.05.019 · DOI
- 10.1310/tsr2003-218 · DOI
- 10.1177/0269215508090673 · DOI
- 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181b33350 · DOI
- 10.1089/g4h.2016.0109 · DOI
- 10.1177/0269215514543333 · DOI
- 10.3390/s140712451 · DOI
- 10.23736/s1973-9087.17.04516-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104343 · DOI
- 10.5535/arm.2012.36.4.521 · DOI
- 10.12659/msm.891112 · DOI
- 10.1589/jpts.25.1027 · DOI
- 10.1097/phm.0000000000000567 · DOI
- 10.1016/s0028-3843(14)60154-7 · DOI
- 10.1589/jpts.28.3112 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.04.029 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.08.035 · DOI
- 10.1589/jpts.27.1145 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.11.007 · DOI
- 10.1080/09638288.2018.1503732 · DOI
- 2016, The Core Competences of a Physiotherapist, 1
- 10.1186/s12984-018-0478-4 · DOI
- 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002730 · DOI
- Higgins, J, 2024, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventionsversion (version 6.5)
- Boutron, I, 2024, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 6.5)
- Lefebvre, C, 2024, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 6.5)
- Sjögren, T, 2024, Digital Health and Wireless Solutions. NCDHWS 2024, 371, 10.1007/978-3-031-59080-1_27 · DOI
- 10.1016/s1474-4422(16)30121-1 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10055-019-00407-8 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12984-019-0546-4 · DOI
- 10.1161/strokeaha.108.540781 · DOI
- 10.2340/16501977-0337 · DOI
- 10.1016/s1836-9553(13)70161-9 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Krohn, M., Rintala, A., Immonen, J., & Sjögren, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Jyväskylä (FI)
- LAB University of Applied Sciences (FI)
- Central Finland Health Care District (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Krohn, Maria
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2024-12-02
- Volume
- 26
- Pages
- e59136
- ISSN
- 1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11650088
- OpenAlex
- W4404919386
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Jyväskylän Yliopisto
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Keywords
- chronic stroke, virtual reality, exercise therapy, balance training, gait training, walking speed, balance confidence, stroke rehabilitation, long-term rehabilitation, physiotherapy, Berg Balance Scale, 6-minute walk test, cadence, functional reach test, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, walking endurance, walking distance, walking time, walking cadence
- MeSH terms
- Stroke Rehabilitation, Virtual Reality, Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Postural Balance, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Walking, Stroke
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review