Cited by 17Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effectiveness of Therapeutic Exercise Interventions With Virtual Reality on Balance and Walking Among Persons With Chronic Stroke: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials

Open access
Krohn, Maria, Rintala, Aki, Immonen, Jaakko, Sjögren, Tuulikki·2024·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Well-targeted balance, walking, and weight-shift training can improve balance capabilities in the chronic phase of stroke. There is an urgent need for a long-term approach to rehabilitation that extends beyond the acute and subacute phases, supporting participation without increasing the demand for health care staff. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic exercise interventions with virtual reality (VR) training on balance and walking at the activity and participation levels in individuals with chronic stroke, compared with control groups receiving no treatment, conventional physical therapy, specific training, similar treatment, or identical treatment without VR. Methods: Studies were searched across 6 databases. The inclusion criteria were as follows: Adults aged 18 years or older with a stroke diagnosis for at least 6 months (population). Therapeutic exercises within a VR environment, using VR glasses or interactive games (intervention). Control groups without the use of VR (including no treatment, conventional physical therapy, specific training, similar treatment without VR, or identical treatment without the additional use of VR; comparison). We evaluated the Berg Balance Scale score, Functional Reach Test performance, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale score, Six-minute Walk Test, Two-minute Walk Test, 10-meter Walk Test results, and cadence (outcome measures). We investigated randomized controlled trials (study design). A meta-analysis and a meta-regression analysis were conducted to evaluate whether the content of VR interventions or control groups, as well as the level of VR immersion used, was related to balance or walking outcomes. Results: A total of 43 randomized controlled trials involving 1136 participants were included in this review. The use of VR training in therapeutic exercise interventions had a large effect on balance (standardized mean difference 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.72; P<.001) and a moderate effect on walking (standardized mean difference 0.31, 95% CI 0.09-0.53; P=.006) in individuals with chronic stroke, compared with pooled control groups (no treatment, conventional physical therapy, specific training, similar treatment, or identical treatment without the use of VR). According to the meta-regression findings, the content of VR interventions (P=.52), the type of control groups (P=.79), and the level of VR immersion (P=.82) were not significantly related to the pooled balance or walking outcomes. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) was moderate for balance and low for walking. Conclusions: Therapeutic exercise training with VR had a positive, albeit moderate, effect on balance and a low impact on walking at the level of activity (capacity), even in the chronic phase of stroke, without serious side effects. The results are applicable to working-aged stroke rehabilitees who are able to walk without assistance. Further research is needed with defined VR methods and outcomes that assess performance at the level of real-life participation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/59136

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 101

  1. 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30962-x · DOI
  2. 10.1159/000352050 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.lpm.2016.11.007 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/1747493016676285 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.01.011 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.12.026 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/09638288.2021.1900418 · DOI
  8. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013839 · DOI
  9. 10.3109/09638289709166530 · DOI
  10. 10.1155/2014/594540 · DOI
  11. 10.1177/0018720820904229 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.401 · DOI
  13. 10.1310/tsr1402-52 · DOI
  14. 10.1186/s12984-016-0124-y · DOI
  15. 10.1145/166117.166134 · DOI
  16. Ma, M, 2011, Advanced Computational Intelligence Paradigms in Healthcare 6. Virtual Reality in Psychotherapy, Rehabilitation, and Assessment, 169
  17. 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31325-3 · DOI
  18. 10.3109/17518423.2010.535805 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.06.010 · DOI
  20. Rintala, A, 2017, Etäteknologian Vaikuttavuus Liikunnallisessa Kuntoutuksessa: Järjestelmällinen Kirjallisuuskatsaus Ja Meta-Analyysi
  21. 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.11.007 · DOI
  22. 10.1155/2016/7309272 · DOI
  23. 10.1080/10749357.2016.1183349 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/10749357.2016.1250373 · DOI
  25. 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0062 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.05.017 · DOI
  27. 10.1177/0269215515593611 · DOI
  28. 10.2196/24111 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/10749357.2016.1192361 · DOI
  30. 10.1155/2019/7595639 · DOI
  31. 10.1109/vr.2019.8797828 · DOI
  32. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Systematic Review ToolCovidence2020-01-05https://www.covidence.org
  34. O'Connor, D, 2011, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 5.1.0)
  35. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.023 · DOI
  36. 10.1080/09638288.2022.2140844 · DOI
  37. 10.4103/1673-5374.156977 · DOI
  38. 10.1037/0090-5550.46.3.296 · DOI
  39. Higgins, J, 2011, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 5.1.0)
  40. 10.1016/j.hkpj.2014.04.002 · DOI
  41. Deeks, J, 2011, Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 5.1.0)
  42. 10.1136/bmj.d4002 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02168.x · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.18637/jss.v036.i03 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Fleiss, JL, 1981, Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions (2nd ed.)
  46. 10.1097/phm.0b013e31828cd5d3 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.09.003 · DOI
  48. 10.1620/tjem.228.69 · DOI
  49. 10.1089/g4h.2017.0126 · DOI
  50. 10.1589/jpts.24.1133 · DOI
  51. 10.1589/jpts.23.859 · DOI
  52. 10.1589/jpts.27.3693 · DOI
  53. 10.1589/jpts.27.655 · DOI
  54. 10.1589/jpts.24.755 · DOI
  55. 10.1080/00222895.2019.1574259 · DOI
  56. 10.1589/jpts.27.1883 · DOI
  57. 10.1589/jpts.27.2175 · DOI
  58. 10.12965/jer.130066 · DOI
  59. 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000447 · DOI
  60. 10.1589/jpts.27.2057 · DOI
  61. 10.1589/jpts.27.845 · DOI
  62. 10.1166/jno.2016.1875 · DOI
  63. 10.1177/0269215515584382 · DOI
  64. 10.12659/msm.898157 · DOI
  65. 10.1177/0269215511419383 · DOI
  66. 10.1589/jpts.28.2596 · DOI
  67. 10.1589/jpts.24.901 · DOI
  68. 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.019 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.05.019 · DOI
  70. 10.1310/tsr2003-218 · DOI
  71. 10.1177/0269215508090673 · DOI
  72. 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181b33350 · DOI
  73. 10.1089/g4h.2016.0109 · DOI
  74. 10.1177/0269215514543333 · DOI
  75. 10.3390/s140712451 · DOI
  76. 10.23736/s1973-9087.17.04516-6 · DOI
  77. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104343 · DOI
  78. 10.5535/arm.2012.36.4.521 · DOI
  79. 10.12659/msm.891112 · DOI
  80. 10.1589/jpts.25.1027 · DOI
  81. 10.1097/phm.0000000000000567 · DOI
  82. 10.1016/s0028-3843(14)60154-7 · DOI
  83. 10.1589/jpts.28.3112 · DOI
  84. 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.04.029 · DOI
  85. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.08.035 · DOI
  86. 10.1589/jpts.27.1145 · DOI
  87. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.11.007 · DOI
  88. 10.1080/09638288.2018.1503732 · DOI
  89. 2016, The Core Competences of a Physiotherapist, 1
  90. 10.1186/s12984-018-0478-4 · DOI
  91. 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002730 · DOI
  92. Higgins, J, 2024, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventionsversion (version 6.5)
  93. Boutron, I, 2024, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 6.5)
  94. Lefebvre, C, 2024, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 6.5)
  95. Sjögren, T, 2024, Digital Health and Wireless Solutions. NCDHWS 2024, 371, 10.1007/978-3-031-59080-1_27 · DOI
  96. 10.1016/s1474-4422(16)30121-1 · DOI
  97. 10.1007/s10055-019-00407-8 · DOI
  98. 10.1186/s12984-019-0546-4 · DOI
  99. 10.1161/strokeaha.108.540781 · DOI
  100. 10.2340/16501977-0337 · DOI
  101. 10.1016/s1836-9553(13)70161-9 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Krohn, M., Rintala, A., Immonen, J., & Sjögren, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Jyväskylä (FI)
  • LAB University of Applied Sciences (FI)
  • Central Finland Health Care District (FI)
Corresponding author
Krohn, Maria
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2024-12-02
Volume
26
Pages
e59136
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404919386
Cited by
17
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Jyväskylän Yliopisto
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Keywords
chronic stroke, virtual reality, exercise therapy, balance training, gait training, walking speed, balance confidence, stroke rehabilitation, long-term rehabilitation, physiotherapy, Berg Balance Scale, 6-minute walk test, cadence, functional reach test, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, walking endurance, walking distance, walking time, walking cadence
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Virtual Reality, Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Postural Balance, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Walking, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review