Digital Solution to Support Medication Adherence and Self-Management in Patients with Cancer (SAMSON): Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Medication nonadherence is a serious problem in cancer, potentially impacts patients’ health outcomes and health care costs. Although technology-based medication adherence (MA) interventions have emerged, evidence supporting their quality and effectiveness remains limited. Objective: This study tested the acceptability, feasibility, and potential effects of Safety and Adherence to Medications and Self-care Advice in Oncology (SAMSON), a digital solution designed to support MA and self-management in cancer. Methods: A 12-week, 2-arm, unblinded, pragmatic pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted. Adults with hematological malignancies who started oral cancer medicines within the last 12 months were recruited from a metropolitan specialized hospital and randomized 1:1 to SAMSON or control (usual care). The SAMSON solution included a smartphone app with tailored alerts and real-time self-care advice, a web-based dashboard for health care professionals (HCPs) to monitor patients’ adherence and symptoms, and motivational interviewing (MI) teleconsultations delivered by oncology nurses and pharmacists at baseline and weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12. Primary outcomes were the patients’ acceptance of SAMSON, measured by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology at 12 weeks, and study feasibility, measured by predefined rates of recruitment, randomization, retention, intervention adherence, and outcome assessment completion. Secondary outcomes were comparison of MA and clinical self-assessments through online questionnaires, including adherence, toxicity self-management, anxiety and depression symptoms, and quality of life, measured at baseline and 12 weeks between the 2 arms. Data retrieved from the SAMSON app (Swinburne University of Technology) was analysed for task completion. Results: A total of 33 patients (79% of those who were approached) consented to participate in the trial. Of those, 31/33 (94%) completed baseline surveys and were randomized to SAMSON (15/31) and control arms (16/31). Of 31 patients, 28 (90%) completed the 12-week surveys (12 SAMSON and 16 control). Overall, patients rated the SAMSON solution as highly acceptable (13/15, 87% app usage; 14/15, 93% MI teleconsultation delivery). They reported that SAMSON was easy to use (10/12, 83%) and helpful in improving their MA (6/12, 50%). All study HCPs reported the SAMSON solution was helpful in supporting patients’ MA. Patients completed an average of 99 tasks over the 12-week study period (71% of scheduled tasks). Most patients (10/12, 83%) completed all 5 scheduled consultations. All study feasibility measures were higher than the predefined upper thresholds, except the rate of patients’ responses to medication reminders. Conclusions: The results demonstrated that the SAMSON solution is acceptable, usable, and useful for oncology HCPs and patients with cancer. The SAMSON solution is feasible in real-life oncology settings. Our next steps involve refining the SAMSON solution based on participants’ feedback, conducting a large-scale randomized controlled trial to evaluate its clinical and economic effectiveness, and exploring potential commercialization. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12623000472673; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=385728 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079122
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many of the included technologies were evaluated in pilot, feasibility, or early implementation studies.
“Finally, many of the included technologies were evaluated in pilot, feasibility, or early implementation studies [39,43,53,54].”
From Digital health technologies in oncology services: A scoping review of clinical implementation, organisational evidence gaps, and policy implications (2026) · cites this paper as [53]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials.
Eldridge, S. M., Chan, C. L., Campbell, M. J., Bond, C. M., Hopewell, S., Thabane, L., & Lancaster, G. A. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i5239 · Cited by 3,404 · see citing works
The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research
Leon, A. C., Davis, L. L., & Kraemer, H. C. (2011) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.008 · Cited by 1,917 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…the patients’ acceptance of SAMSON, measured by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) [24,25] at 12 weeks (t 1 ), and study feasibility, measured by predefined rates of recruitment, randomization, retention, intervention adherence, and outcome assessment completion [26,27].”
Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews
Slattery, P., Saeri, A. K., & Bragge, P. (2020) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9 · Cited by 1,313 · see citing works
Linardon, J., & Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. (2020) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000459 · Cited by 573 · see citing works
Patient adherence and persistence with oral anticancer treatment
Ruddy, K., Mayer, E., & Partridge, A. (2009) · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20004 · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Abbott, J. H. (2014) · Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2014.0110 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Wu, E. Q., Johnson, S., Beaulieu, N., Arana, M., Bollu, V., Guo, A., Coombs, J., Feng, W., & Cortes, J. (2010) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1185/03007990903396469 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Internet-based randomized controlled trials: a systematic review
Mathieu, E., McGeechan, K., Barratt, A., & Herbert, R. (2013) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001175 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Adherence to oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies in chronic myeloid leukemia
Gater, A., Heron, L., Abetz-Webb, L., Coombs, J., Simmons, J., Guilhot, F., & Rea, D. (2012) · Leukemia Research · doi:10.1016/j.leukres.2012.01.021 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- [1]Weingart SN Brown E Bach PB Eng K Johnson SA Kuzel TM Langbaum TS Leedy RD Muller RJ Newcomer LN O'Brien S Reinke D Rubino M Saltz L Walters RS NCCN Task Force Report: oral chemotherapy J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2008 03 6 Suppl 3 S1 14 18377852 18377852
- [3]Agrawal M Garg RJ Cortes J Quintás-Cardama A Tyrosine kinase inhibitors: the first decade Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2010 5 2 70 80 10.1007/s11899-010-0045-y 20425399 20425399 · DOI
- [4]Alshawa A Gong J Marcott V Khan R Boving V Brown L Beno J Kheder E Fu S Strategic improvement of oral antineoplastic investigational agents compliance Global Journal on Quality and Safety in Healthcare 2019 2 1 5 10 10.4103/jqsh.Jqsh_23_18 · DOI
- [7]Bouwman L Eeltink CM Visser O Janssen J Maaskant JM Prevalence and associated factors of medication non-adherence in hematological-oncological patients in their home situation BMC Cancer 2017 17 1 739 10.1186/s12885-017-3735-1 29121889 10.1186/s12885-017-3735-1 29121889 PMC5679497 · DOI
- [10]Guilhot F Coombs J Zernovak O Szczudlo T Rosti G A global retrospective and physician-based analysis of adherence to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapies for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) Blood 2010 116 21 1514 10.1182/blood.V116.21.1514.1514 · DOI
- [11]Jabbour EJ Kantarjian H Eliasson L Cornelison AM Marin D Patient adherence to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia Am J Hematol 2012 87 7 687 691 10.1002/ajh.23180 22473898 22473898 PMC11726351 · DOI
- [13]Ekinci E Nathoo S Korattyil T Vadhariya A Zaghloul HA Niravath PA Abughosh SM Trivedi MV Interventions to improve endocrine therapy adherence in breast cancer survivors: what is the evidence? J Cancer Surviv 2018 12 3 348 356 10.1007/s11764-017-0674-4 29396760 10.1007/s11764-017-0674-4 29396760 · DOI
- [14]Kavookjian J Wittayanukorn S Interventions for adherence with oral chemotherapy in hematological malignancies: a systematic review Res Social Adm Pharm 2015 11 3 303 314 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.08.006 25262600 S1551-7411(14)00310-6 25262600 · DOI
- [17]Greer JA Amoyal N Nisotel L Fishbein JN MacDonald J Stagl J Lennes I Temel JS Safren SA Pirl WF A systematic review of adherence to oral antineoplastic therapies Oncologist 2016 21 3 354 376 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0405 26921292 theoncologist.2015-0405 26921292 PMC4786357 · DOI
- [18]Dang TH Forkan ARM Wickramasinghe N Jayaraman PP Alexander M Burbury K Schofield P Investigation of intervention solutions to enhance adherence to oral anticancer medicines in adults: overview of reviews JMIR Cancer 2022 8 2 e34833 10.2196/34833 35475978 v8i2e34833 35475978 PMC9096640 · DOI
- [19]Dang TH Wickramasinghe N Forkan ARM Jayaraman PP Burbury K O'Callaghan C Whitechurch A Schofield P Co-design, development, and evaluation of a mobile solution to improve medication adherence in cancer: design science research approach JMIR Cancer 2024 10 e46979 10.2196/46979 38569178 v10i1e46979 38569178 PMC11024750 · DOI
- [20]Dang TH Ludlow C Borle H Alexander M Wickramasinghe N Burbury K Jayaraman PP Schofield P Co-designing a motivational interviewing training platform to enhance oncology healthcare professional communication PEC Innov 2024 5 100335 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100335 39257627 S2772-6282(24)00083-9 39257627 PMC11385463 · DOI
- [21]Eysenbach G CONSORT-EHEALTH Group Improving and standardizing evaluation reports of web-based and mobile health interventions J Med Internet Res 2011 13 4 e126 10.2196/jmir.1923 22209829 v13i4e126 22209829 PMC3278112 · DOI · Paper page
- [22]Dang TH Wickramasinghe N Jayaraman PP Burbury K Alexander M Whitechurch A Quinn S Rowan G Brooks SL Schofield P Safety and adherence to medications and self-care advice in oncology (SAMSON): pilot randomised controlled trial protocol BMJ Open 2024 14 7 e079122 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079122 39043598 bmjopen-2023-079122 PMC11268069 39043598 · DOI
- [23]Broglio K Randomization in clinical trials: permuted blocks and stratification JAMA 2018 319 21 2223 2224 10.1001/jama.2018.6360 29872845 2683203 29872845 · DOI · Paper page
- [24]Venkatesh V Morris MG Davis GB Davis FD User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view MIS Quarterly 2003 27 3 425 10.2307/30036540 · DOI · Paper page
- [25]Venkatesh V Thong JYL Xu X Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology MIS Quarterly 2012 36 1 157 10.2307/41410412 · DOI · Paper page
- [30]Hess LM Raebel MA Conner DA Malone DC Measurement of adherence in pharmacy administrative databases: a proposal for standard definitions and preferred measures Ann Pharmacother 2006 40 7-8 1280 1288 10.1345/aph.1h018 16868217 · DOI
- [31]Matza LS Park J Coyne KS Skinner EP Malley KG Wolever RQ Derivation and validation of the ASK-12 adherence barrier survey Ann Pharmacother 2009 43 10 1621 1630 10.1345/aph.1M174 19776298 aph.1M174 19776298 · DOI · Paper page
- [32]Hibbard JH Mahoney ER Stockard J Tusler M Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure Health Serv Res 2005 40 6 Pt 1 1918 1930 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00438.x 16336556 HESR438 16336556 PMC1361231 · DOI
- [33]Bahrom NH Ramli AS Isa MR Baharudin N Badlishah-Sham SF Mohamed-Yassin MS Abdul-Hamid H Validity and reliability of the patient activation measure (PAM)-13 Malay version among patients with metabolic syndrome in primary care Malays Fam Physician 2020 15 3 22 34 33329860 33329860 PMC7735884
- [34]Quach CW Langer MM Chen RC Thissen D Usinger DS Emerson MA Reeve BB Reliability and validity of PROMIS measures administered by telephone interview in a longitudinal localized prostate cancer study Qual Life Res 2016 25 11 2811 2823 10.1007/s11136-016-1325-3 27240448 10.1007/s11136-016-1325-3 27240448 PMC6126915 · DOI
- [35]Cella DF Tulsky DS Gray G Sarafian B Linn E Bonomi A Silberman M Yellen SB Winicour P Brannon J The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure J Clin Oncol 1993 11 3 570 579 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.3.570 8445433 8445433 · DOI · Paper page
- [37]Dang TH O'Callaghan C Alexander M Burbury K Jayaraman PP Wickramasinghe N Schofield P 'Take the tablet or don't take the tablet?' A qualitative study of patients' experiences of self-administering anti-cancer medications related to adherence and managing side effects Support Care Cancer 2023 31 12 680 10.1007/s00520-023-08122-6 37934298 10.1007/s00520-023-08122-6 37934298 PMC10630231 · DOI
- [38]Borgstrom E Barclay S Experience-based design, co-design and experience-based co-design in palliative and end-of-life care BMJ Support Palliat Care 2019 9 1 60 66 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001117 28209568 bmjspcare-2016-001117 28209568 · DOI
- [40]Hevner A Wickramasinghe N Wickramasinghe NS Schaffer JL Design science research opportunities in health care Theories to Inform Superior Health Informatics Research and Practice. 1st ed 2018 Cham Springer
- [41]Bell DL Roomaney R Exploring the barriers that prevent practitioners from implementing motivational interviewing in their work with clients Social Work 2020 56 4 416 429 10.15270/56-4-884 · DOI
- [42]Nagy SM Butame SA Todd L Sheffler JL Budhwani H Fernandez MI MacDonell K Naar S Barriers and facilitators to implementing a motivational interviewing-based intervention: a multi-site study of organizations caring for youth living with HIV AIDS Care 2022 34 4 486 491 10.1080/09540121.2021.1950604 34251935 34251935 PMC8752625 · DOI
- [44]Daniore P Nittas V Gille F von Wyl V Promoting participation in remote digital health studies: an expert interview study Digit Health 2023 9 20552076231212063 10.1177/20552076231212063 38025101 10.1177_20552076231212063 38025101 PMC10644759 · DOI
- [46]Stewart SJF Moon Z Horne R Medication nonadherence: health impact, prevalence, correlates and interventions Psychol Health 2023 38 6 726 765 10.1080/08870446.2022.2144923 36448201 36448201 · DOI
- [47]Brízido C Ferreira AM Lopes P Strong C Sá Mendes G Fernandes Gama F Durazzo A Rocha Rodrigues G Matos D Guerreiro S Madeira S Ferreira J Adragão Pedro Mendes M Medication adherence to direct anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation - a real world analysis Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2021 40 9 669 675 10.1016/j.repce.2021.07.002 34503705 S2174-2049(21)00156-2 34503705 · DOI
- [48]Smith SK Kuhn E O'Donnell J Koontz BF Nelson N Molloy K Chang J Hoffman J Cancer distress coach: pilot study of a mobile app for managing posttraumatic stress Psychooncology 2018 27 1 350 353 10.1002/pon.4363 28032921 28032921 PMC10079303 · DOI
- [49]Kelley MM Kue J Brophy L Peabody AL Foraker RE Yen PY Tucker S Mobile health applications, cancer survivors, and lifestyle modification: an integrative review Comput Inform Nurs 2021 39 11 755 763 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000781 34074873 00024665-202111000-00019 34074873 PMC8578050 · DOI
- [50]Smith SK Zimmerman S Williams CS Benecha H Abernethy AP Mayer DK Edwards LJ Ganz PA Post-traumatic stress symptoms in long-term non-Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors: does time heal? JCO 2011 29 34 4526 4533 10.1200/jco.2011.37.2631 PMC3236652 21990412 · DOI
- [51]Mollica M Nemeth L Newman SD Mueller M Quality of life in African American breast cancer survivors: an integrative literature review Cancer Nurs 2015 38 3 194 204 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000160 24945269 24945269 · DOI
- [52]Hrynyschyn R Prediger C Stock C Helmer SM Evaluation methods applied to digital health interventions: what is being used beyond randomised controlled trials? A scoping review Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022 19 9 5221 10.3390/ijerph19095221 35564616 ijerph19095221 35564616 PMC9102232 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tsitsi, T., Polychronis, G., Papoui, E., Cloconi, C., Michail, K., & Charalambous, A. (2026) · Journal of Cancer Policy · doi:10.1016/j.jcpo.2026.100789
- Authors
- Dang, T. H., Wickramasinghe, N., Jayaraman, P. P., Burbury, K., Alexander, M., Whitechurch, A., Dyer, M., Quinn, S., Forkan, A. R. M., & Schofield, P.
- Affiliations
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU)
- La Trobe University (AU)
- Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Dang, Thu Ha
- ORCID
- Venue
- JMIR Formative Research
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2025-02-19
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- e65302
- ISSN
- 2561-326X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11888109
- OpenAlex
- W4405314677
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 5.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JMIR Formative Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- medication adherence, cancer self-management, digital health interventions, mobile application, hematologic malignancies, oral anticancer drugs, motivational interviewing, teleconsultation, feasibility and acceptability, anxiety and depression, quality of life, UTAUT, Samson
- MeSH terms
- Self-Management, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Pilot Projects, Telemedicine, Medication Adherence, Mobile Applications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review