Cited by 204Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsMethodologies in Health Research and Practice

The Distinction Between Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) and Preliminary Feasibility and Pilot Studies: What They Are and Are Not

Abbott, J. Haxby·2014·Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy

Abstract

Feasibility and pilot studies play an important role in the preliminary planning of a proposed full-size randomized clinical trial (RCT). In essence, feasibility studies are used to help develop trial interventions or outcome measures, whereas pilot studies replicate, in miniature, a planned full-size RCT. However, the terms used for these preliminary studies are sometimes considered synonymous, and in practice may overlap considerably or be combined. The important issue is not the distinction between these: the important distinction is between such preliminary studies and a proper RCT. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2014;44(8):555–558. doi:10.2519/jospt.2014.0110

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2519/jospt.2014.0110

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abbott, J. H.
Corresponding author
Abbott, J. Haxby
Venue
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
Published
2014-08
Volume
44
Issue
8
Pages
555-558
ISSN
  • 0190-6011 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-1344
OpenAlex
W2064386551
Cited by
204
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
Keywords
randomized controlled trials, feasibility study, pilot study, trial design, intervention development, outcome measures
MeSH terms
Feasibility Studies, Humans, Terminology as Topic, Pilot Projects, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review