Cited by 77Cancer survivorship and careMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

eHealth for Breast Cancer Survivors: Use, Feasibility and Impact of an Interactive Portal

Open access
Kuijpers, Wilma, Groen, Wim G, Oldenburg, Hester SA, Wouters, Michel WJM, Aaronson, Neil K, van Harten, Wim H·2016·JMIR Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: MijnAVL is an interactive portal including patient education, overview of appointments, access to the electronic medical records (EMR), patient-reported outcomes, plus feedback and physical activity support. OBJECTIVE: With this study we aimed to evaluate the use, feasibility, and impact of MijnAVL among breast cancer survivors. METHODS: We included survivors currently or recently treated with curative intent, who completed questions on sociodemographics, patient activation (PAM), quality of life (SF-36), and physical activity (IPAQ). MijnAVL could be used noncommittally for four months. Log data were collected retrospectively and participants completed questions on acceptability, satisfaction, and the PAM, SF-36 and IPAQ. RESULTS: Ninety-two women (mean age 49.5 years, 59% on-treatment) participated, with a mean number of logins of 8.7. Overview of appointments (80% of participants) and access to the EMR (90%) were most frequently used and most highly valued. Average website user satisfaction was 3.8 on a 5-point scale. Although participants reported having more knowledge and experiencing more control of their situation after using MijnAVL, PAM scores did not change significantly. Three domains of the SF-36 (role functioning - emotional, mental health, and social functioning) and median vigorous physical activity improved significantly over time. The burden of MijnAVL for professionals was limited. CONCLUSIONS: User experiences were positive and exposure to MijnAVL was accompanied by improvements in three quality of life domains and vigorous physical activity. Tailored features may be needed to enhance the usefulness and efficacy of MijnAVL. Research with a controlled design is needed to confirm our findings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/cancer.5456

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Log data analyses in eHealth research have mainly focused on descriptive statistics such as number of logins, time spent, and frequency of use of different elements by all users as a group.

    “Log data analyses in eHealth research have mainly focused on descriptive statistics, such as the number of logins, time spent, and the frequency of use of the different elements by all users as a group [18-20].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuijpers, W., Groen, W. G., Oldenburg, H. S., Wouters, M. W., Aaronson, N. K., & van Harten, W. H.
Affiliations
The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
Venue
JMIR Cancer
Published
2016-05-10
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
e3
ISSN
2369-1999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2409089748
Cited by
77
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
KWF Kankerbestrijding
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
breast cancer survivors, e-health, patient activation, quality of life, physical activity, patient-reported outcomes, patient education, user satisfaction, feasibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review