Cited by 40Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityDigital Mental Health Interventions

EHealth acceptance and new media preferences for therapy assistance among breast cancer patients.

Open access
Drewes, Caroline, Kirkovits, Thomas, Schiltz, Daniel, Schinkoethe, Timo, Haidinger, Renate, Goldmann-Posch, Ursula, Harbeck, Nadia, Wuerstlein, Rachel·2016·JMIR Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electronic health (eHealth) and mobile communication-based health care (mHealth) applications have been increasingly utilized in medicine over the last decade, and have facilitated improved adherence to therapy regimens in patients with chronic conditions. Due to the long duration of breast cancer therapy, and the long course of disease in metastatic breast cancer, a need for more intensified physician-patient communication has emerged. Various support mechanisms, including new media such as mHealth and eHealth, have been proposed for this purpose. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between sociodemographic factors, as well as health status of breast cancer patients, and their current utilization of new media, or their willingness to use Internet and mobile phone apps for improvement of therapy management. METHODS: The survey for this study was conducted anonymously during the 2012 Mamazone Projekt Diplompatient meeting (Augsburg, Germany), which hosted approximately 375 participants per day. A total of 168 questionnaires were completed. The questionnaire aimed to assess sociodemographic status, disease patterns, and current use of new media (ie, Internet, mobile phone, and mobile phone apps) in breast cancer patients. Habits and frequency of use for these new technologies, as well as patients' affinity towards eHealth and mHealth tools for therapy management improvement, were investigated. RESULTS: Almost all participants used the Internet (95.8%, 161/168), with 91.5% (151/165) also utilizing this technology for health-related issues. Approximately 23% (38/168) of respondents owned a mobile phone. When asked about their preferences for therapy assistance, 67.3% (113/168) of respondents were interested in assistance via the Internet, 25.0% (42/168) via mobile phone, and 73.2% (123/168) via call center. Patients diagnosed with breast cancer <5 years before the survey were significantly more interested in a call center than patients diagnosed >5 years before survey participation. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of breast cancer patients accept the Internet for therapy assistance, which indicates that eHealth is a promising medium to improve patient-physician communication. Such technologies may improve individual disease management and ultimately lead to an enhanced adherence to therapy regimens.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/cancer.5711

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23]Fronstin P Findings from the 2011 EBRI/MGA Consumer Engagement in Health Care Survey EBRI Issue Brief 2011 12 365 1 26 22312794 22312794

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Drewes, C., Kirkovits, T., Schiltz, D., Schinkoethe, T., Haidinger, R., Goldmann-Posch, U., Harbeck, N., & Wuerstlein, R.
Affiliations
LMU Klinikum (DE)
Corresponding author
Wuerstlein, Rachel
Venue
JMIR Cancer
Published
2016-09-14
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
e13
ISSN
2369-1999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2518745652
Cited by
40
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
6.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
breast cancer, e-health, mobile health, mobile phone app, internet use, treatment management, patient-physician communication, medication adherence, sociodemographic factors, metastatic breast cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review