Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 374

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effectiveness of Web-based Interventions on Patient Empowerment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Open access
Samoocha, David, Bruinvels, David J, Elbers, Nieke A, Anema, Johannes R, van der Beek, Allard J·2010·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient empowerment is growing in popularity and application. Due to the increasing possibilities of the Internet and eHealth, many initiatives that are aimed at empowering patients are delivered online. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate whether Web-based interventions are effective in increasing patient empowerment compared with usual care or face-to-face interventions. METHODS: We performed a systematic review by searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases from January 1985 to January 2009 for relevant citations. From the 7096 unique citations retrieved from the search strategy, we included 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met all inclusion criteria. Pairs of review authors assessed the methodological quality of the obtained studies using the Downs and Black checklist. A meta-analysis was performed on studies that measured comparable outcomes. The GRADE approach was used to determine the level of evidence for each outcome. RESULTS: In comparison with usual care or no care, Web-based interventions had a significant positive effect on empowerment measured with the Diabetes Empowerment Scale (2 studies, standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29 - 0.94]), on self-efficacy measured with disease-specific self-efficacy scales (9 studies, SMD = 0.23, 95% CI 0.12 - 0.33), and on mastery measured with the Pearlin Mastery Scale (1 study, mean difference [MD] = 2.95, 95% CI 1.66 - 4.24). No effects were found for self-efficacy measured with general self-efficacy scales (3 studies, SMD = 0.05, 95% CI -0.25 to 0.35) or for self-esteem measured with the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (1 study, MD = -0.38, 95% CI -2.45 to 1.69). Furthermore, when comparing Web-based interventions with face-to-face deliveries of the same interventions, no significant (beneficial or harmful) effects were found for mastery (1 study, MD = 1.20, 95% CI -1.73 to 4.13) and self-esteem (1 study, MD = -0.10, 95% CI -0.45 to 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: Web-based interventions showed positive effects on empowerment measured with the Diabetes Empowerment Scale, disease-specific self-efficacy scales and the Pearlin Mastery Scale. Because of the low quality of evidence we found, the results should be interpreted with caution. The clinical relevance of the findings can be questioned because the significant effects we found were, in general, small.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.1286

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Bruegel, R B, 1998, J AHIMA, 69, 30
  2. Harris, R, 2004, The Empowerment Model and Using E-Health to Distribute Information
  3. 10.1016/S0168-8510(98)00007-4 · DOI
  4. Neuhauser, Duncan, 2003, Qual Manag Health Care, 12, 171, 10.1097/00019514-200307000-00007 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00238.x · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00238.x
  6. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60875-2 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.008 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Anderson, R M, 1995, Diabetes Care, 18, 943, 10.2337/diacare.18.7.943 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.02.008 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1002/14651858.CD005108.pub2 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Funnell, Martha M, 2005, Diabetes Educ, 31, 53, 55
  12. Lorig, K R, 2001, Eff Clin Pract, 4, 256
  13. 10.1016/S0020-7489(03)00095-6 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02114.x · DOI
  15. 10.1002/art.20395 · DOI
  16. 10.1097/00002820-199706000-00004 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1080/13561820601035020 · doi:10.1080/13561820601035020
  18. 10.1136/bmj.37999.716157.44 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/0738-3991(95)00830-6 · DOI
  20. Anderson, Bill, 2007, Am J Manag Care, 13, S103
  21. 10.2196/jmir.5.2.e8 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1258/jrsm.96.2.74 · doi:10.1258/jrsm.96.2.74 · Paper page
  23. 10.2196/jmir.1035 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Homer, C, 2000, Pediatrics, 106, 210, 10.1542/peds.106.S1.210 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1542/peds.111.3.503 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1093/her/16.6.647 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Wydra, E W, 2001, Oncol Nurs Forum, 28, 1399
  28. 10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00108-1 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1177/0193945902250039 · DOI
  30. 10.3129/I08-001 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1080/02699050600909789 · DOI
  33. Man, David W K, 2006, NeuroRehabilitation, 21, 205, 10.3233/NRE-2006-21303 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/her/cym014 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/0169-2607(89)90065-5 · DOI
  36. 10.1186/1471-244X-7-72 · DOI
  37. 10.1080/10640260500403790 · DOI
  38. 10.1097/00006199-200601000-00005 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/jts.20071 · DOI
  40. 10.1089/dia.2006.0034 · DOI
  41. 10.2196/jmir.990 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.2196/jmir.6.2.e12 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.197 · DOI
  44. 10.1089/tmj.2006.0051 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.2337/diacare.23.6.739 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Schwarzer, R, 1995, Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M, editors. Measures in Health Psychology: a User's Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs, 35
  47. 10.2196/jmir.7.2.e21 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2006.02.004 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.034 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 374

Metadata

Authors
Samoocha, D., Bruinvels, D. J., Elbers, N. A., Anema, J. R., & van der Beek, A. J.
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2010-06-24
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
e23
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142298007
Cited by
374
References
23
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effectiveness of Web-based Interventions on Patient Empowerment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2196/jmir.1286
The paper
Samoocha, D., Bruinvels, D. J., Elbers, N. A., Anema, J. R., & van der Beek, A. J. (2010). Effectiveness of Web-based Interventions on Patient Empowerment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1286

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.