The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protected Health Information on Social Networking Sites: Ethical and Legal Considerations
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Social networking site use is increasingly common among emerging medical professionals, with medical schools even reporting disciplinary student expulsion. Medical professionals who use social networking sites have unique responsibilities since their postings could violate patient privacy. However, it is unknown whether students and residents portray protected health information and under what circumstances or contexts. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to document and describe online portrayals of potential patient privacy violations in the Facebook profiles of medical students and residents. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team performed two cross-sectional analyses at the University of Florida in 2007 and 2009 of all medical students and residents to see who had Facebook profiles. For each identified profile, we manually scanned the entire profile for any textual or photographic representations of protected health information, such as portrayals of people, names, dates, or descriptions of procedures. RESULTS: Almost half of all eligible students and residents had Facebook profiles (49.8%, or n=1023 out of 2053). There were 12 instances of potential patient violations, in which students and residents posted photographs of care they provided to individuals. No resident or student posted any identifiable patient information or likeness in text form. Each instance occurred in developing countries on apparent medical mission trips. These portrayals increased over time (1 in the 2007 cohort; 11 in 2009; P = .03). Medical students were more likely to have these potential violations on their profiles than residents (11 vs 1, P = .04), and there was no difference by gender. Photographs included trainees interacting with identifiable patients, all children, or performing medical examinations or procedures such as vaccinations of children. CONCLUSIONS: While students and residents in this study are posting photographs that are potentially violations of patient privacy, they only seem to make this lapse in the setting of medical mission trips. Trainees need to learn to equate standards of patient privacy in all medical contexts using both legal and ethical arguments to maintain the highest professional principles. We propose three practical guidelines. First, there should be a legal resource for physicians traveling on medical mission trips such as an online list of local laws, or a telephone legal contact. Second, institutions that organize medical mission trips should plan an ethics seminar prior the departure on any trip since the legal and ethical implications may not be intuitive. Finally, at minimum, traveling physicians should apply the strictest legal precedent to any situation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As previous research shows, the public availability of information on patients and physicians represents a threat to privacy [140-142], with the potential for a negative impact on patient-physician relationships [143,144].”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Given the increasing use of SM among medical students and health professionals and the concerns about unprofessional behaviors online (15, 50–56), these findings provide an important foundation for developing training on PSM in medical schools.”
From Identifying social media professionalism competencies in Vietnamese medical students: a modified Delphi method (2026) · cites this paper as [53]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cohen, J. (1992) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783 · Cited by 5,870
Medicine 2.0: Social Networking, Collaboration, Participation, Apomediation, and Openness
Eysenbach, G. (2008) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1030 · Cited by 1,143
Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication
Chou, W.-Y. S., Hunt, Y. M., Beckjord, E. B., Moser, R. P., & Hesse, B. W. (2009) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1249 · Cited by 1,082
Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities
Eysenbach, G., & Till, J. (2001) · British medical journal · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103 · Cited by 1,027
Disciplinary Action by Medical Boards and Prior Behavior in Medical School
Papadakis, M. A., Teherani, A., Banach, M. A., Knettler, T. R., Rattner, S. L., Stern, D. T., Veloski, J. J., & Hodgson, C. S. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa052596 · Cited by 840
Online Posting of Unprofessional Content by Medical Students
Chretien, K. C. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1387 · Cited by 448
The Intersection of Online Social Networking with Medical Professionalism
Thompson, L. A., Dawson, K., Ferdig, R., Black, E. W., Boyer, J., Coutts, J., & Black, N. P. (2008) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-008-0538-8 · Cited by 425
Standards for privacy of individually identifiable health information. Final rule.
(2002) · PubMed · Cited by 317
Content of Weblogs Written by Health Professionals
Lagu, T., Kaufman, E. J., Asch, D. A., & Armstrong, K. (2008) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-008-0726-6 · Cited by 255
Sharing Medical Data for Health Research: The Early Personal Health Record Experience
Weitzman, E. R., Kaci, L., & Mandl, K. D. (2010) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1356 · Cited by 151
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- LampeCEllisonNSteinfeldCChanges in the use and perception of Facebook2008ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work2008San Diego, CA, USA
- 2002, Fed Regist, 67, 53182
- Bradke, AJ, 2007, The Ethics of Medical Brigades in Honduras: Who Are We Helping? [master's thesis]
- 2001, J AHIMA, 72, 64M
- Gakh, M, 2006, ISJLP, 2, 781
- Davolt, DA, 2000, J Biocommun, 27, 22
- Nissenbaum, H, 2004, Washington Law Rev, 79, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social Media: A Review and Tutorial of Applications in Medicine and Health Care
Grajales III, F. J., Sheps, S., Ho, K., Novak-Lauscher, H., & Eysenbach, G. (2014) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2912 · Cited by 737
The Use of Social Media in Graduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review
Sterling, M. R., Leung, P. B. K., Wright, D., & Bishop, T. F. (2017) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001617 · Cited by 366
Reviewing social media use by clinicians: Table 1
von Muhlen, M., & Ohno-Machado, L. (2012) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000990 · Cited by 319
Velasco, E., AGHENEZA, T., Denecke, K., Kirchner, G., & Eckmanns, T. (2014) · Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12038 · Cited by 254
Chatbots: Security, privacy, data protection, and social aspects
Hasal, M., Nowaková, J., Ahmed Saghair, K., Abdulla, H., Snášel, V., & Ogiela, L. (2021) · Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/cpe.6426 · Cited by 249
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, L. A., Black, E., Duff, W. P., Paradise Black, N., Saliba, H., & Dawson, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida Health (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Thompson, Lindsay A
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2011-01-19
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e8
- ISSN
- 1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3221358
- OpenAlex
- W2145918625
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 16.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Florida
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Thoreau and American Literature
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Keywords
- protected health information, social networking sites, Facebook, patient privacy, medical students, medical residents, medical missions, privacy violations, professional ethics, legal issues
- MeSH terms
- Confidentiality, Cross-Sectional Studies, Developing Countries, Humans, Internship and Residency, Medical Missions, Physicians, Social Support, Students, Medical, Consumer Health Information
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
