Cited by 319Social Media in Health EducationImpact of Technology on AdolescentsInnovations in Medical Education

Reviewing social media use by clinicians: Table 1

Open access
von Muhlen, Marcio, Ohno-Machado, Lucila·2012·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

Adoption studies of social media use by clinicians were systematically reviewed, up to July 26th, 2011, to determine the extent of adoption and highlight trends in institutional responses. This search led to 370 articles, of which 50 were selected for review, including 15 adoption surveys. The definition of social media is evolving rapidly; the authors define it broadly to include social networks and group-curated reference sites such as Wikipedia. Facebook accounts are very common among health science students (64-96%) and less so for professional clinicians (13-47%). Adoption rates have increased sharply in the past 4 years. Wikipedia is widely used as a reference tool. Attempts at incorporating social media into clinical training have met with mixed success. Posting of unprofessional content and breaches of patient confidentiality, especially by students, are not uncommon and have prompted calls for social media guidelines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000990

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [8]Thompson JB Merchants of Culture. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2010
  2. [49]Pender MP Lasserre KE Del Mar C Is Wikipedia unsuitable as a clinical information resource for medical students? Med Teach 2009; 31: 1095– 6 20050104
  3. [72]American Medical Association AMA Policy: Professionalism in the Use of Social Media. Press Release. http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/meeting/professionalism-social-media.shtml (accessed 12 Aug 2011).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
von Muhlen, M., & Ohno-Machado, L.
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2012-09
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
777-781
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W2140815329
Cited by
319
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of California, San Diego
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U54HL108460)
  • Fogarty International Center (R24TW008805)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
social media use, clinicians, technology adoption, health sciences students, Facebook, Wikipedia, clinical teaching, professional conduct, patient confidentiality, social media policy, institutional policy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Confidentiality, Diffusion of Innovation, Education, Professional, Humans, Physician-Patient Relations, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Students, Medical, Students, Pharmacy, Internet, Professional Misconduct, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review