The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Evaluation of the Use of Smartphones to Communicate Between Clinicians: A Mixed-Methods Study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Communication between clinicians is critical to providing quality patient care but is often hampered by limitations of current systems. Smartphones such as BlackBerrys may improve communication, but studies of these technologies have been limited to date. OBJECTIVE: Our objectives were to describe how smartphones were adopted for clinical communication within general internal medical wards and determine their impact on team effectiveness and communication. METHODS: This was a mixed-methods study that gathered data from the frequency of smartphone calls and email messages, clinicians' interviews, and ethnographic observations of clinical communication interactions. Triangulation of qualitative and quantitative data was undertaken to develop common themes that encompass comprehensive and representative insights across different methods. RESULTS: Findings from our study indicated that over a 24-hour period, nurses sent on average 22.3 emails to the physicians mostly through the "team smartphone," the designated primary point of contact for a specific medical team. Physicians carrying the team smartphone received on average 21.9 emails and 6.4 telephone calls while sending out 6.9 emails and initiating 8.3 telephone calls over the 24-hour period. Our analyses identified both positive and negative outcomes associated with the use of smartphones for clinical communication. There was a perceived improvement in efficiency over the use of pagers for clinical communication for physicians, nurses, and allied health professionals. In particular, residents found that the use of smartphones helped to increase their mobility and multitasking abilities. Negative outcomes included frequent interruptions and discordance between what doctors and nurses considered urgent. Nurses perceived a worsening of the interprofessional relationships due to overreliance on messaging by text with a resulting decrease in verbal communication. Unprofessional behaviors were observed in the use of smartphones by residents. CONCLUSIONS: Routine adoption of smartphones by residents appeared to improve efficiency over the use of pagers for physicians, nurses, and allied health professionals. This was balanced by negative communication issues of increased interruptions, a gap in perceived urgency, weakened interprofessional relationships, and unprofessional behavior. Further communication interventions are required that balance efficiency and interruptions while maintaining or even improving interprofessional relationships and professionalism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter
(2002) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02082-3 · Cited by 1,021
Laxmisan, A., Hakimzada, F., Sayan, O. R., Green, R. A., Zhang, J., & Patel, V. L. (2007) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.09.019 · Cited by 449
Practicing Medicine in the Age of Facebook
Jain, S. H. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp0901277 · Cited by 179
Cited by
The Smartphone in Medicine: A Review of Current and Potential Use Among Physicians and Students
Ozdalga, E., Ozdalga, A., & Ahuja, N. (2012) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1994 · Cited by 654
Wallace, S., Clark, M., & White, J. (2012) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001099 · Cited by 432
Smartphone addiction and depression, anxiety: The role of bedtime procrastination and self-control
Geng, Y., Gu, J., Wang, J., & Zhang, R. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.062 · Cited by 309
Colorectal smartphone apps: opportunities and risks
O’Neill, S., & Brady, R. R. W. (2012) · Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03088.x · Cited by 165
Cingi, C., Yorgancioglu, A., Cingi, C. C., Oguzulgen, K., Muluk, N. B., Ulusoy, S., Orhon, N., Yumru, C., Gokdag, D., Karakaya, G., et al. (2015) · International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology · doi:10.1002/alr.21468 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, R., Rossos, P., Quan, S., Reeves, S., Lo, V., Wong, B., Cheung, M., & Morra, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2011-08-29
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e59
- ISSN
- 1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082260805
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 22.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.