Cited by 274Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsEducational Games and GamificationDigital Mental Health Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effect of Social Support Features and Gamification on a Web-Based Intervention for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Allam, Ahmed, Kostova, Zlatina, Nakamoto, Kent, Schulz, Peter Johannes·2015·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is chronic systematic disease that affects people during the most productive period of their lives. Web-based health interventions have been effective in many studies; however, there is little evidence and few studies showing the effectiveness of online social support and especially gamification on patients' behavioral and health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to look into the effects of a Web-based intervention that included online social support features and gamification on physical activity, health care utilization, medication overuse, empowerment, and RA knowledge of RA patients. The effect of gamification on website use was also investigated. METHODS: We conducted a 5-arm parallel randomized controlled trial for RA patients in Ticino (Italian-speaking part of Switzerland). A total of 157 patients were recruited through brochures left with physicians and were randomly allocated to 1 of 4 experimental conditions with different types of access to online social support and gamification features and a control group that had no access to the website. Data were collected at 3 time points through questionnaires at baseline, posttest 2 months later, and at follow-up after another 2 months. Primary outcomes were physical activity, health care utilization, and medication overuse; secondary outcomes included empowerment and RA knowledge. All outcomes were self-reported. Intention-to-treat analysis was followed and multilevel linear mixed models were used to study the change of outcomes over time. RESULTS: The best-fit multilevel models (growth curve models) that described the change in the primary outcomes over the course of the intervention included time and empowerment as time-variant predictors. The growth curve analyses of experimental conditions were compared to the control group. Physical activity increased over time for patients having access to social support sections plus gaming (unstandardized beta coefficient [B]=3.39, P=.02). Health care utilization showed a significant decrease for patients accessing social support features (B=-0.41, P=.01) and patients accessing both social support features and gaming (B=-0.33, P=.03). Patients who had access to either social support sections or the gaming experience of the website gained more empowerment (B=2.59, P=.03; B=2.29, P=.05; respectively). Patients who were offered a gamified experience used the website more often than the ones without gaming (t91=-2.41, P=.02; U=812, P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: The Web-based intervention had a positive impact (more desirable outcomes) on intervention groups compared to the control group. Social support sections on the website decreased health care utilization and medication overuse and increased empowerment. Gamification alone or with social support increased physical activity and empowerment and decreased health care utilization. This study provides evidence demonstrating the potential positive effect of gamification and online social support on health and behavioral outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 57366516; http://www.controlled-trials. com/ISRCTN57366516 (Archived by webcite at http://www.webcitation.org/6PBvvAvvV).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.3510

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 70 references

1 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Westby, MD, 2000, J Rheumatol, 27, 1674
  2. Kirshner, M, 2003, AMIA Annu Symp Proc, 895
  3. Klemm, P, 1999, Comput Nurs, 17, 65
  4. 10.1111/j.1083-6101 · DOI
  5. USI Press20131152014-10-16Primary results of ONESELF experiment presented to patients and doctors in presence of local media [in Italian]http://www.press.usi.ch/en/comunicati-stampa/comunicato-stampa.htm?id=10856TMouNjIt

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 274

Metadata

Authors
Allam, A., Kostova, Z., Nakamoto, K., & Schulz, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Allam, Ahmed
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2015-01-09
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
e14
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055539671
Cited by
274
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5
FWCI
35.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
rheumatoid arthritis, online intervention, gamification, online social support, physical activity, health care utilization, medication overuse, patient empowerment, disease knowledge, internet use, chronic disease self-management, digital health interventions, Italian-speaking Switzerland, Ticino River, Ticino valley
MeSH terms
Adult, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Female, Health Resources, Health Services Misuse, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Patient Education as Topic, Power, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Social Support, Switzerland, Single-Blind Method, Video Games, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review