The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
eHealth, Participatory Medicine, and Ethical Care: A Focus Group Study of Patients’ and Health Care Providers’ Use of Health-Related Internet Information
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The rapid explosion in online digital health resources is seen as transformational, accelerating the shift from traditionally passive patients to patients as partners and altering the patient-health care professional (HCP) relationship. Patients with chronic conditions are increasingly engaged, enabled, and empowered to be partners in their care and encouraged to take responsibility for managing their conditions with HCP support. OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we focus on patients' and HCPs' use of health-related Internet information and how it influences the patient-HCP relationship. In particular, we examine the challenges emerging in medical encounters as roles and relationships shift and apply a conceptual framework of relational ethics to examine explicit and nuanced ethical dimensions emerging in patient-HCP interactions as both parties make increased use of health-related Internet information. METHODS: We purposively sampled patients and HCPs in British Columbia, Canada, to participate in focus groups. To be eligible, patients self-reported a diagnosis of arthritis and at least one other chronic health condition; HCPs reported a caseload with >25% of patients with arthritis and multimorbidity. We used a semistructured, but flexible, discussion guide. All discussions were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Elements of grounded theory guided our constant comparison thematic analytic approach. Analysis was iterative. A relational ethics conceptual lens was applied to the data. RESULTS: We recruited 32 participants (18 patients, 14 HCPs). They attended seven focus groups: four with patients and three with rehabilitation professionals and physicians. Predominant themes to emerge were how use of health-related Internet information fostered (1) changing roles, (2) patient-HCP partnerships, and (3) tensions and burdens for patients and HCPs. CONCLUSIONS: Relational aspects such as mutual trust, uncertainty, and vulnerability are illuminated in patient-HCP interactions around health-related Internet information and the negotiated space of clinical encounters. New roles and associated responsibilities have key ethical dimensions that make clear the changes are fundamental and important to understand in ethical care. When faced with tensions and burdens around incorporating health-related Internet information as a resource in clinical encounters, participants described a particular ambivalence illustrating the fundamental changes being negotiated by both patients and HCPs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Contradictory information could result in additional questions arising about health and trigger a seemingly endless cycle of information seeking [38, 39].”
In the citing paper
“Essentially, the internet was thought to be informative, but there was evidence that people had concerns about the quality of the information available on the internet, with the belief it could be contradictory at times and should be seen as provisional [38].”
In the citing paper
“Searching for health information online demands time, energy, and physical effort, especially for those not as familiar with technology [38, 39, 51].”
In the citing paper
“HCP’s were thus viewed as expert guides who could aid navigation through the otherwise overwhelming quantities of health-related internet information [38].”
In the citing paper
“It was also seen as a way to help them to make the most of the short time they have in consultations so they know what questions to ask [30, 38].”
In the citing paper
“Many HCP’s agreed that it was important to show support to patients who used the internet for health information, but that such behaviours can bring associated tensions [38].”
In the citing paper
“HCP’s also felt that patient preparation promoted more focused, effective, and efficient consultations [38].”
In the citing paper
“Many studies explained that enabling better communication with HCP’s was one of several reasons why patients used the internet to explore health information [27, 38, 40, 45].”
In the citing paper
“HCP’s do sometimes experience anxiety around internet-informed patients, and some may find some of the information patients bring to consultations, slightly outside their area of expertise [38].”
In the citing paper
“HCP’s agreed on the importance of collaboration with and guidance for patients, though they struggled to find the time to do this efficiently [38].”
In the citing paper
“People used information from the internet to become better informed about their health, to prepare for their consultation, to enable them to ask better questions and to help them better understand the information given to them by HCP’s [30, 38] thus helping to make consultations more productive for them.”
In the citing paper
“When HCP’s create an atmosphere that is open, this can encourage patients to discuss the information they have discovered; additionally the patient’s perception of invading the role of the HCP or their embarrassment may be reduced, which, overall, can enhance the relationship between the patient and HCP [28, 38].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles of Biomedical Ethics
(2012) · Thieves of Virtue · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9079.003.0009 · Cited by 13,453
Principles of Biomedical Ethics
Collins, M. A. (1990) · AORN Journal · doi:10.1016/s0001-2092(07)68177-0 · Cited by 1,512
McMullan, M. (2006) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.006 · Cited by 1,106
Swan, M. (2012) · Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks · doi:10.3390/jsan1030217 · Cited by 934
Social Media: A Review and Tutorial of Applications in Medicine and Health Care
Grajales III, F. J., Sheps, S., Ho, K., Novak-Lauscher, H., & Eysenbach, G. (2014) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2912 · Cited by 737
The digitally engaged patient: self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era
Lupton, D. (2013) · Social Theory & Health · doi:10.1057/sth.2013.10 · Cited by 728
Supporting Patient Autonomy: The Importance of Clinician-patient Relationships
Entwistle, V. A., Carter, S. M., Cribb, A., & McCaffery, K. J. (2010) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1292-2 · Cited by 542
Murray, E., Lo, B., Pollack, L. M., Donelan, K., Catania, J., Lee, K. C. L., Zapert, K., & Turner, R. (2003) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.5.3.e17 · Cited by 462
The Politics of women's health: exploring agency and autonomy
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-3364 · Cited by 418
Swan, M. (2012) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm2030093 · Cited by 400
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- 2009, Patient-Centered E-Health (Premier Reference Source)
- Wickramasinghe, N, 2010, Critical Issues for the Development of Sustainable E-health Solutions (Healthcare Delivery in the Information Age)
- 10.5750/ejpch.vlil.645) · DOI
- AustinWTexto Contexto Enferm20142014-08-16Engagement in contemporary practice: a relational ethics perspectivehttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-07072006000500015&lng=en6Xe5gYvfl
- 10.1353/ijf.2011.0025 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.006 · DOI · Paper page
- Corbin, JM, 1988, Unending Work and Care: Managing Chronic Illness at Home (Jossey Bass Social and Behavioral Science Series)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–106 of 106
Farnood, A., Johnston, B., & Mair, F. S. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13059295
Farnood, A., Johnston, B., & Mair, F. S. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13059292
Farnood, A., Johnston, B., & Mair, F. S. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13059286
Aydin, M. O., Alper, Z., Özkaya, G., & Çalışkan, S. A. (2026) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-08515-7
Adambounou, K. F. T., Kuto, R. S., Kouevidjin, A. B., & Agbodjan, A. (2026) · Journal of Tropical Medicine · doi:10.1155/jotm/4658443
Santé connectée et prévention du suicide : vers une aide à la décision
Berrouiguet, S. (2018) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/2696c6dbzc238z4132zbe79zc76436fd7b90
Metadata
- Authors
- Townsend, A., Leese, J., Adam, P., McDonald, M., Li, L. C., Kerr, S., & Backman, C. L.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Vancouver Coastal Health (CA)
- Research Canada (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Townsend, Anne
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2015-06-22
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e155
- ISSN
- 1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4526955
- OpenAlex
- W1525997899
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 16.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (122907_1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Keywords
- e-health, participatory medicine, physician-patient relationship, relational ethics, ethical care, patient empowerment, chronic disease, arthritis, multimorbidity, rehabilitation professionals, trust, uncertainty, vulnerability, ambivalence
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Arthritis, British Columbia, Canada, Chronic Disease, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Occupational Therapy, Patient Participation, Professional-Patient Relations, Rheumatology, Comorbidity, Focus Groups, Telemedicine, Internet, Uncertainty, Trust, Qualitative Research, Consumer Health Information, Self Report, Physical Therapists, Grounded Theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
