Cited by 106Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareElectronic Health Records Systems

eHealth, Participatory Medicine, and Ethical Care: A Focus Group Study of Patients’ and Health Care Providers’ Use of Health-Related Internet Information

Open access
Townsend, Anne, Leese, Jenny, Adam, Paul, McDonald, Michael, Li, Linda C, Kerr, Sheila, Backman, Catherine L·2015·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rapid explosion in online digital health resources is seen as transformational, accelerating the shift from traditionally passive patients to patients as partners and altering the patient-health care professional (HCP) relationship. Patients with chronic conditions are increasingly engaged, enabled, and empowered to be partners in their care and encouraged to take responsibility for managing their conditions with HCP support. OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we focus on patients' and HCPs' use of health-related Internet information and how it influences the patient-HCP relationship. In particular, we examine the challenges emerging in medical encounters as roles and relationships shift and apply a conceptual framework of relational ethics to examine explicit and nuanced ethical dimensions emerging in patient-HCP interactions as both parties make increased use of health-related Internet information. METHODS: We purposively sampled patients and HCPs in British Columbia, Canada, to participate in focus groups. To be eligible, patients self-reported a diagnosis of arthritis and at least one other chronic health condition; HCPs reported a caseload with >25% of patients with arthritis and multimorbidity. We used a semistructured, but flexible, discussion guide. All discussions were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Elements of grounded theory guided our constant comparison thematic analytic approach. Analysis was iterative. A relational ethics conceptual lens was applied to the data. RESULTS: We recruited 32 participants (18 patients, 14 HCPs). They attended seven focus groups: four with patients and three with rehabilitation professionals and physicians. Predominant themes to emerge were how use of health-related Internet information fostered (1) changing roles, (2) patient-HCP partnerships, and (3) tensions and burdens for patients and HCPs. CONCLUSIONS: Relational aspects such as mutual trust, uncertainty, and vulnerability are illuminated in patient-HCP interactions around health-related Internet information and the negotiated space of clinical encounters. New roles and associated responsibilities have key ethical dimensions that make clear the changes are fundamental and important to understand in ethical care. When faced with tensions and burdens around incorporating health-related Internet information as a resource in clinical encounters, participants described a particular ambivalence illustrating the fundamental changes being negotiated by both patients and HCPs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.3792

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [40]Austin W Texto Contexto Enferm 2014 2014-08-16 Engagement in contemporary practice: a relational ethics perspective http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-07072006000500015&lng=en 6Xe5gYvfl
  2. [45]Ells C Hunt M Chambers-Evans J Relational Autonomy as an Essential Component of Patient-Centered Care Engagement in Contemporary Practice: A Relational Ethics Perspective 2011 4 2 79 101 10.1353/ijf.2011.0025 · DOI
  3. [55]McMullan M Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship Patient Educ Couns 2006 10 63 1-2 24 8 10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.006 16406474 S0738-3991(05)00315-0 16406474 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Townsend, A., Leese, J., Adam, P., McDonald, M., Li, L. C., Kerr, S., & Backman, C. L.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Vancouver Coastal Health (CA)
  • Research Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Townsend, Anne
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2015-06-22
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
e155
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1525997899
Cited by
106
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
FWCI
16.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (122907_1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
e-health, participatory medicine, physician-patient relationship, relational ethics, ethical care, patient empowerment, chronic disease, arthritis, multimorbidity, rehabilitation professionals, trust, uncertainty, vulnerability, ambivalence
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Arthritis, British Columbia, Canada, Chronic Disease, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Occupational Therapy, Patient Participation, Professional-Patient Relations, Rheumatology, Comorbidity, Focus Groups, Telemedicine, Internet, Uncertainty, Trust, Qualitative Research, Consumer Health Information, Self Report, Physical Therapists, Grounded Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review