Cited by 28Electronic Health Records SystemsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Is Provider Secure Messaging Associated With Patient Messaging Behavior? Evidence From the US Army

Open access
Wolcott, Vickee, Agarwal, Ritu, Nelson, D. Alan·2017·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Secure messaging with health care providers offers the promise of improved patient-provider relationships, potentially facilitating outcome improvements. But, will patients use messaging technology in the manner envisioned by policy-makers if their providers do not actively use it? OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that the level and type of secure messaging usage by providers might be associated with messaging initiation by their patients. METHODS: The study employed a dataset of health care and secure messaging records of more than 81,000 US Army soldiers and nearly 3000 clinicians with access to a patient portal system. We used a negative binomial regression model on over 25 million observations to determine the adjusted association between provider-initiated and provider-response messaging and subsequent messaging by their patients in this population over a 4-year period. RESULTS: Prior provider-initiated and response messaging levels were associated with new patient messaging when controlling for the patient's health care utilization and diagnoses, with the strongest association for high provider-response messaging level. Patients whose providers were highly responsive to the messages of other patients initiated 334% more secure messages (P<.001) than patients with providers who did not personally respond to other patients' messages. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that provider messaging usage levels and types thereof predict their patients' subsequent communication behavior. The findings suggest the need for more study into the factors associated with provider messaging to fully understand the mechanisms of this relationship.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.6804

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [6]Institute of Medicine Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century 2001 Washington, DC National Academies Press 25057539
  2. [12]Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Federalregister 2014 2017-01-16 Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Electronic Health Record Incentive Program-Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 Through 2017; Proposed Rule https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2015/10/16/2015-25595/medicare-and-medicaid-programs-electronic-health-record-incentive-program-stage-3-and-modifications 26110197

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolcott, V., Agarwal, R., & Nelson, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Baylor University (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Wolcott, Vickee
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2017-04-06
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
e103
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2604684863
Cited by
28
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
6.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
secure messaging, patient-provider communication, patient portals, military health services, U.S. Army soldiers, health information technology adoption, patient engagement
MeSH terms
Patient Portals, Adult, Communication, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Military Personnel, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Physician-Patient Relations, United States, Electronic Mail

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review