Cited by 77Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsUsability and User Interface DesignHealth, Technology, Consumer Behavior

Evaluating Patient Usability of an Image-Based Mobile Health Platform for Postoperative Wound Monitoring

Open access
Gunter, Rebecca, Fernandes-Taylor, Sara, Mahnke, Andrea, Awoyinka, Lola, Schroeder, Chad, Wiseman, Jason, Sullivan, Sarah, Bennett, Kyla +2 more·2016·JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical patients are increasingly using mobile health (mHealth) platforms to monitor recovery and communicate with their providers in the postdischarge period. Despite widespread enthusiasm for mHealth, few studies evaluate the usability or user experience of these platforms. OBJECTIVE: Our objectives were to (1) develop a novel image-based smartphone app for postdischarge surgical wound monitoring, and (2) rigorously user test it with a representative population of vascular and general surgery patients. METHODS: A total of 9 vascular and general surgery inpatients undertook usability testing of an internally developed smartphone app that allows patients to take digital images of their wound and answer a survey about their recovery. We followed the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9241-11 guidelines, focusing on effectiveness, efficiency, and user satisfaction. An accompanying training module was developed by applying tenets of adult learning. Sessions were audio-recorded, and the smartphone screen was mirrored onto a study computer. Digital image quality was evaluated by a physician panel to determine usefulness for clinical decision making. RESULTS: The mean length of time spent was 4.7 (2.1-12.8) minutes on the training session and 5.0 (1.4-16.6) minutes on app completion. 55.5% (5/9) of patients were able to complete the app independently with the most difficulty experienced in taking digital images of surgical wounds. Novice patients who were older, obese, or had groin wounds had the most difficulty. 81.8% of images were sufficient for diagnostic purposes. User satisfaction was high, with an average usability score of 83.3 out of 100. CONCLUSION: Surgical patients can learn to use a smartphone app for postoperative wound monitoring with high user satisfaction. We identified design features and training approaches that can facilitate ease of use. This protocol illustrates an important, often overlooked, aspect of mHealth development to improve surgical care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/mhealth.6023

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [54]Tullis T Albert W Measuring the user experience: collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics, second edition 2013 San Diego Morgan Kaufmann

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gunter, R., Fernandes-Taylor, S., Mahnke, A., Awoyinka, L., Schroeder, C., Wiseman, J., Sullivan, S., Bennett, K., Greenberg, C., & Kent, K. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Marshfield Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Gunter, Rebecca
Venue
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Published
2016-09-28
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
e113
ISSN
2291-5222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2526066647
Cited by
77
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4
FWCI
16.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL110853)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
Keywords
mobile health, mobile application, usability, user experience, post-discharge care, vascular surgery, general surgery, user satisfaction, adult learning, image quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review