Cited by 161Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMobile Learning in EducationICT in Developing Communities

Effectiveness and Appropriateness of mHealth Interventions for Maternal and Child Health: Systematic Review

Open access
Chen, Huan, Chai, Yanling, Dong, Le, Niu, Wenyi, Zhang, Puhong·2018·JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND The application of mobile health (mHealth) technology in reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health (RMNCH) is increasing worldwide. However, best practice and the most effective mHealth interventions have not been reviewed systematically. OBJECTIVE A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of mHealth interventions for RMNCH around the world were conducted to investigate their characteristics as well as the features and effectiveness of mHealth interventions. METHODS Studies of mHealth interventions for RMNCH between January 2011 and December 2016 were retrieved from 6 databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Global Health, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, and Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Medium). Comparable studies were included in a random-effects meta-analysis for both exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) and antenatal checks (ANC). Descriptive analyses were conducted for mHealth studies with a range of study designs. RESULTS Analyses of 245 studies were included, including 51 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Results showed that there are increasing numbers of studies on mHealth interventions for RMNCH. Although 2 meta-analysis, one with 2 RCTs on EBF (odds ratio [OR] 2.03, 95% CI 1.34-3.08, I2=25%) and the other with 3 RCTs on ANC (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.13-1.79, I2=78%), showed that mHealth interventions are more effective than usual care, almost half (43%) of RCTs showed negative or unclear results on mHealth interventions. Functions described in mHealth interventions were diverse, and the health stages covered were broad. However, single function or single stage appeared to be dominant among mHealth interventions compared with multiple functions or stages. CONCLUSIONS More rigorous evaluations are needed to draw consistent conclusions and to analyze mHealth products with multiple functions, especially those popular in the app markets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/mhealth.8998

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SMS text messaging is a simple and effective intervention for improving health service delivery in pregnant women, infectious disease cases, weight loss cases, and diabetes cases, and increasingly for smoking cessation support.

    “Short message service (SMS) text messaging, in particular, has been shown to be a simple and effective intervention for improving health service delivery in pregnant women [9,10], infectious disease cases [11,12], weight loss cases [13], and diabetes cases [14] and increasingly for smoking cessation support [15-18].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [6]Malvey D Slovensky D MHealth: Transforming Healthcare 2014 New York Springer
  2. [22]Yao N Wang F Wang X Yu Q Liu X Research in mother and child health organization of China: a bibliometric analysis Chinese Journal of Medical Library and Information Science 2012 08 18 22

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, H., Chai, Y., Dong, L., Niu, W., & Zhang, P.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Hebei Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Puhong
Venue
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Published
2018-01-09
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
e7
ISSN
2291-5222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2783413804
Cited by
161
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
Keywords
mobile health, mobile health intervention, maternal and child health, reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health, exclusive breastfeeding, prenatal care, intervention effectiveness, intervention appropriateness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review