The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effectiveness of a Mobile App Intervention for Preparing Preschool Children and Parents for Day Surgery: Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.2196/46989
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Day surgery allows families to return home quickly. Only a few approaches to preparing for day surgery have demonstrated how digital solutions can support families and children. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile app intervention on preschool children’s fear and pain and parents’ anxiety and stress in preparing children for day surgery. METHODS: This study was conducted at the Pediatric Day Surgical Department of a university hospital in Finland between 2018 and 2020. Parents of children (aged 2-6 y) who were in a queue for elective day surgery were randomized into the intervention group (IG; n=36) and control group (CG; n=34). The CG received routine preparations, whereas the IG was prepared using a mobile app. Parents’ and children’s outcomes were measured using validated scales at 4 different points: at home (T1 and T4) and at the hospital (T2 and T3) before and after surgery. Group differences were analyzed using statistical methods suitable for the material. RESULTS: Before surgery, parents in both groups experienced mild anxiety, which decreased after surgery. Parental anxiety did not differ between groups preoperatively (P=.78) or postoperatively (P=.63). Both groups had less anxiety at home after surgery compared with before. The IG showed a significant decrease (P=.003); the CG also improved (P=.002). Preoperatively at home, most parents in both groups experienced no stress or mild stress (P=.61). Preoperatively at the hospital, parents in both groups experienced mild stress; however, parents in the IG experienced more stress during this phase (P=.02). Parents in the IG experienced significantly less stress postoperatively than those in the CG (P=.05). Both groups showed decreased stress levels from before to after surgery (IG: P=.003; CG: P=.004) within each group. There were no significant differences in children’s pain levels between the groups and measurement points. This was observed before surgery at home (P=.25), before surgery at the hospital (P=.98), and after surgery at the hospital (P=.72). Children’s fear decreased more in the IG (P=.006) than in the CG (P=.44) comparing the phases before and after surgery at home. Fear did not differ between the IG and CG preoperatively at home (P=.20) or at the hospital (P=.59) or postoperatively at the hospital (P=.62) or at home (P=.81). CONCLUSIONS: The mobile app intervention did not reduce anxiety or pain. However, it was observed that parents in the IG experienced substantially heightened stress levels before surgery at the hospital, which decreased significantly after surgery at home. In addition, fear levels in children in the IG decreased over time, whereas no significant change was observed in the CG. These results are important for developing health care service chains and providing families with innovative and customer-oriented preparation methods. CLINICALTRIAL: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03774303; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03774303
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
the CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-11-32 · Cited by 1,871
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 66
- 10.1007/s12630-010-9333-1 · DOI
- 10.1111/ijn.12449 · DOI
- 10.1111/jocn.13895 · DOI
- 10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkt066 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pedn.2020.05.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pedn.2012.07.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pedn.2017.09.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pedhc.2017.08.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jopan.2016.09.011 · DOI
- 10.1007/s43390-020-00038-z · DOI
- 10.1002/nop2.332 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10578-015-0540-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pedn.2019.02.033 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bjae.2020.08.003 · DOI
- 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000632 · DOI
- 10.2196/jmir.5043 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2196/jmir.2588 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2196/17292 · DOI
- 10.2196/17113 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jopan.2014.11.016 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijso.2020.03.004 · DOI
- 10.3109/09546634.2013.814757 · DOI
- 10.2196/resprot.7617 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/pan.14419 · DOI
- 10.1542/peds.2019-1139 · DOI
- 10.1111/jocn.12187 · DOI
- 10.4097/kjae.2013.65.6.508 · DOI
- 10.1097/00000542-200701000-00013 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pedhc.2008.08.002 · DOI
- 10.1111/anae.14639 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pedn.2018.02.001 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001362 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.pec.2018.02.010 · DOI
- 10.3390/children8111069 · DOI
- 10.2196/12028 · DOI
- 10.2196/23626 · DOI
- 10.5005/jp-journals-10077-3074 · DOI
- 10.53841/bpstest.2003.stai · DOI
- 10.1111/apa.12558 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/pec.0b013e31827b2299 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0882-5963(96)80081-9 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00620.x · DOI
- 10.1155/2014/628198 · DOI
- 10.2466/pr0.1994.74.2.659 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1471-6712.2003.00104.x · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.f3662 · DOI
- 10.1111/nep.13709 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.pedn.2020.05.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.06.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1542/hpeds.2017-0008 · DOI
- 10.3109/09638288.2012.656792 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2009.01647.x · DOI
- 10.1080/15374416.2020.1738237 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pedn.2006.05.013 · DOI
- 10.1177/1367493511408632 · DOI
- 10.1177/0300060513503758 · DOI
- 10.1155/2014/938352 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03180.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.194 · DOI
- 10.1111/jan.14301 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.07.016 · DOI
- 10.2196/10858 · DOI
- 10.2196/pediatrics.7248 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pedn.2018.02.001 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00920.x · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Kerimaa, H., Hakala, M., Haapea, M., Vähänikkilä, H., Serlo, W., He, H.-G., & Pölkki, T.
- Affiliations
- Oulu University Hospital (FI)
- University of Oulu (FI)
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Kerimaa, Heli
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2023-03-04
- Volume
- 25
- Pages
- e46989-e46989
- ISSN
- 1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10576237
- OpenAlex
- W4387168778
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
- Keywords
- mobile app intervention, outpatient surgery, preschool children, preoperative preparation, parental anxiety, parental stress, children's fears, postoperative pain, pediatric surgery, digital health interventions, parent-child communication, elective surgery, preoperative anxiety reduction, postoperative pain reduction, postoperative anxiety
- MeSH terms
- Ambulatory Surgical Procedures, Anxiety, Child, Child, Preschool, Fear, Female, Finland, Humans, Male, Parents, Preoperative Care, Stress, Psychological, Mobile Applications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review