Cited by 251Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Learning in Education

Apps and adolescents: a systematic review of adolescents’ use of mobile phone and tablet apps that support personal management of their chronic or long-term physical conditions

Open access
Majeed-Ariss, Rabiya, Baildam, Eileen, Campbell, Malcolm, Chieng, Alice, Fallon, Debbie, Hall, Andrew, McDonagh, Janet E, Stones, Simon R +2 more·2015·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of physical chronic or long-term conditions in adolescents aged 10-24 years is rising. Mobile phone and tablet mobile technologies featuring software program apps are widely used by these adolescents and their healthy peers for social networking or gaming. Apps are also used in health care to support personal condition management and they have considerable potential in this context. There is a growing body of literature on app use in health contexts, thereby making a systematic review of their effectiveness very timely. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature on the effectiveness of mobile apps designed to support adolescents' management of their physical chronic or long-term conditions. METHODS: We conducted a review of the English-language literature published since 2003 in five relevant bibliographical databases using key search terms. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts using data extraction and quality assessment tools. RESULTS: The search returned 1120 hits. Of the 19 eligible full-text papers, four met our review criteria, reporting one pilot randomized controlled trial and three pretest/post-test studies. Samples ranged from 4 to 18 participants, with a combined sample of 46 participants. The apps reported were targeted at type 1 diabetes, asthma, and cancer. Two papers provided data for calculating effect size. Heterogeneity in terms of study design, reported outcomes, follow-up times, participants' ages, and health conditions prevented meta-analyses. There was variation in whether adolescents received guidance in using the app or were solely responsible for navigating the app. Three studies reported some level of patient involvement in app design, development, and/or evaluation. Health professional involvement in the modelling stages of apps was reported in all studies, although it was not always clear whether specific clinical (as opposed to academic) expertise in working with adolescents was represented. The dearth of studies and the small overall sample size emphasizes the need for future studies of the development, evaluation, use, and effectiveness of mobile apps to support adolescents' personal management of their conditions. CONCLUSIONS: A key finding of the review is the paucity of evidence-based apps that exist, in contrast to the thousands of apps available on the app market that are not evidence-based or user or professional informed. Although we aimed to assess the effectiveness of apps, the dearth of studies meeting our criteria meant that we were unable to be conclusive in this regard. Based on the available evidence, apps may be considered feasible health interventions, but more studies involving larger sample sizes, and with patient and health professional input at all stages, are needed to determine apps' acceptability and effectiveness. This review provides valuable findings and paves the way for future rigorous development and evaluation of health apps for adolescents with chronic or long-term conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.5043

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-management interventions have been found to be effective for CA with other chronic diseases such as asthma and diabetes.

    “Self-management interventions have been found to be effective for adults with IBD 4 and also for CA with other chronic diseases 16 such as asthma 17, 18 and diabetes 19 .”

    From A Systematic review of self-management interventions for children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease (2019) · cites this paper as [17]

    The citation is attached to the claim that self-management interventions are effective for adolescents with other chronic diseases. Although the review includes apps for asthma and diabetes, its Discussion > Conclusions states that too few studies were available to determine their effectiveness; Discussion > Limitations likewise says the authors could not comment on effectiveness. The source therefore does not support the claimed established effectiveness. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [1]Jackson Allen P Jackson Allen P Vessey JA Schapiro N The primary care provider and children with chronic conditions Primary Care of the Child with a Chronic Condition. 5th edition 2010 St. Louis, MO Mosby 3 21
  2. [42]Kumar N Khan RA Kumar P Sharma VP E-health: Stipulation of mobile phone technology in adolescent diabetic patient care in pediatric diabetes Proceedings of the the Annual Conference of the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes 2012 Annual Conference of the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes October 10-13, 2012 Istanbul, Turkey
  3. [43]Scaramuzza A Bosetti A Redaelli F Gazzarri A Rossi E Ferrari M Zuccotti GV To WhatsApp or not to WhatsApp? What could be done with new social media to manage type 1 diabetes in adolescents Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes 2014 7th International Conference on Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes February 5-8, 2014 Vienna, Austria
  4. [44]Kovatchev BP Clinical results from transitional and home trials of outpatient closed-loop control Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes 2014 7th International Conference on Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes February 5-8, 2014 Vienna, Austria
  5. [70]Pai ALH Ostendorf HM Treatment adherence in adolescents and young adults affected by chronic illness during the health care transition from pediatric to adult health care: A literature review Child Health Care 2011 1 40 1 16 33 10.1080/02739615.2011.537934 · DOI
  6. [73]Heron KE Smyth JM Ecological momentary interventions: Incorporating mobile technology into psychosocial and health behaviour treatments Br J Health Psychol 2010 02 15 Pt 1 1 39 10.1348/135910709X466063 19646331 bjhp696 19646331 PMC2800172 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [85]Majeed-Ariss R Fallon D Hall A McDonagh J Swallow V Health theory in mobile technology apps supporting young people's long-term condition/s management: A systematic review [in press] Bull Eur Health Psychol Soc 2015 in press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Majeed-Ariss, R., Baildam, E., Campbell, M., Chieng, A., Fallon, D., Hall, A., McDonagh, J. E., Stones, S. R., Thomson, W., & Swallow, V.
Affiliations
  • National Health Service (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Royal Manchester Children's Hospital (GB)
  • Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Swallow, Veronica
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2015-12-23
Volume
17
Issue
12
Pages
e287
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2207811147
Cited by
251
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • University of Manchester
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
Keywords
mobile health apps, adolescents, chronic physical illness, self-management, type 1 diabetes, asthma, cancer, health professional involvement, acceptability, mobile phone app, tablet application, digital health interventions, health literacy, health information seeking
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Prevalence, Cell Phone, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review