The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy–Based Treatment for Insomnia, Nightmares, and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms in Survivors of Wildfires: Pilot Randomized Feasibility Trial (Preprint)
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.2196/65228 · Paper page
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Symptoms of insomnia, nightmares, and trauma are highly prevalent. However, there are significant barriers to accessing evidence-based treatments for these conditions, leading to poor mental health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This pilot trial evaluated the feasibility of a 4-week, digital self-paced intervention combining cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia and exposure, relaxation, and rescripting therapy for nightmares in survivors of wildfires from Australia, Canada, and the United States. METHODS: Study participants were recruited between May 2023 and December 2023 through social media platforms, workshops, conferences, and radio interviews. Participants had to meet at least one of the following criteria: a score of ≥8 on the Insomnia Severity Index, a score of ≥3 on the Nightmare Disorder Index, or a score of ≥31 on the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5. In total, 30 survivors of wildfires were allocated to either the treatment group (n=16, 53%) or the waitlist control group (n=14, 47%) in a sequential manner. Participants’ ages ranged from 18 to 79 years, with a mean age of 52.50 (SD 16.26) years. The cohort consisted of 63% (19/30) female and 37% (11/30) male participants. Participants also completed self-report secondary outcome measures, including the Generalized Anxiety Disorder–7, the Patient Health Questionnaire–9, and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, via the HealthZone digital platform. Assessments were conducted at baseline, the posttreatment time point, and the 3-month follow-up, with the waitlist group undergoing an additional assessment at the pretreatment time point, after 4 weeks of waiting and before crossing over to treatment. This study used intention-to-treat analysis as a primary analysis and per-protocol analysis as a secondary analysis. RESULTS: Mixed-effects linear regression models and difference-in-differences analyses were used to assess the intervention’s effects. The intention-to-treat analysis revealed significant improvements over time (main effect of time), with a 1.64-point reduction (P=.001) on the Nightmare Disorder Index and 10.64-point reduction (P=.009) on the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 at the postintervention time point. No significant changes were observed in insomnia symptoms. On the secondary measures, there was an interaction effect of condition × time, with a 2.22-point reduction (P<.001) on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and a main effect of time, with a 6.48-point reduction (P<.001) on the Patient Health Questionnaire–9. No changes were detected on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder–7. The per-protocol analysis yielded comparable results for both the primary and secondary measures. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this pilot trial demonstrated a reduction in nightmares and trauma symptoms. Future research studies should aim at evaluating the intervention in a more definitive trial with a larger sample size. CLINICALTRIAL: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12623000415606; https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=385054
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
the CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-11-32 · Cited by 1,871
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 57
- 10.3390/bs11090126 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/springerreference_179660 · DOI
- 10.1682/jrrd.2011.09.0164 · DOI
- 10.5664/jcsm.10204 · DOI
- 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.5.855 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.sleepe.2022.100052 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12144-022-03512-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.11.010 · DOI
- 10.1093/sleep/zsx075 · DOI
- 10.1037/tra0000478 · DOI
- 10.5664/jcsm.7770 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.09.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsmc.2010.01.004 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4939-7148-0_24 · DOI
- 10.5664/jcsm.8116 · DOI
- 10.1093/sleep/zsy069 · DOI
- 10.1002/jclp.21970 · DOI
- 10.5664/jcsm.28042 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.beth.2022.08.004 · DOI
- 10.4088/jcp.v63n0804 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0248617 · DOI
- 10.31031/TTEH.2022.03.000559 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s13063-015-0904-x · DOI
- 10.2307/2290095 · DOI
- 10.1002/jts.20199 · DOI
- 10.1093/med:psych/9780199339389.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1016/b978-0-12-381522-4.00015-8 · DOI
- 10.31571/jelte.v2i1.46 · DOI
- 10.1016/s1389-9457(00)00065-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/sleep/34.5.601 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/sleep/zsaa254 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12888-017-1541-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/jts.22059 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01713 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00330-6 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781003117452 · DOI
- 10.1080/01621459.1987.10478551 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5811/westjem.2017.8.35985 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4103/2229-3485.184823 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/mpr.329 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1471-2288-14-75 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bmj.b2393 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3386/w31842 · DOI
- 10.1185/03007990903167415 · DOI
- 10.1037/pas0001098 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/jclp.20737 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/15402000802162539 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/tra0000238 · DOI
- 10.1037/tra0000055 · DOI
- 10.5665/sleep.3408 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11920-022-01326-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sleep.2020.08.023 · DOI
- 10.1002/jts.20569 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Isaac, F., Klein, B., Nguyen, H., Watson, S., & Kennedy, G. A.
- Affiliations
- Federation University (AU)
- RMIT University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Isaac, Fadia
- Venue
- JMIR Human Factors
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2024-09-04
- Volume
- 12
- Pages
- e65228-e65228
- ISSN
- 2292-9495 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11953604
- OpenAlex
- W4408424385
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 9.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JMIR Human Factors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Keywords
- digital cognitive behavioral therapy, insomnia, nightmares, post-traumatic stress disorder, exposure therapy, relaxation training, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, feasibility, mental health interventions, sleep quality, anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress symptoms, natural disasters, access to mental health care, waitlist control, intention-to-treat analysis
- MeSH terms
- Wildfires, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Australia, Canada, Dreams, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, United States, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Survivors, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review