Cited by 199Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Reliable and clinically significant change in the clinician-administered PTSD scale for DSM-5 and PTSD checklist for DSM-5 among male veterans

Open access
Marx, Brian P., Lee, Daniel J., Norman, Sonya B., Bovin, Michelle J., Sloan, Denise M., Weathers, Frank W., Keane, Terence M., Schnurr, Paula P.·2022·Psychological Assessment

Abstract

= 228). For Sample 1, within-person change in CAPS-5 and PCL-5 scores of ≥ 13 and 15, respectively, was indicative of reliable change. For Sample 2, within-person change in CAPS-5 and PCL-5 scores of ≥ 12 and 18, respectively, was indicative of reliable change. Scores of ≤ 8 and 28 on the CAPS-5 and PCL-5, respectively, indicated a participant is more likely to belong to the non-PTSD population than the PTSD population (i.e., clinically significant change) in both Samples 1 and 2. Participants who exhibited reliable or CSC reported significantly better psychosocial functioning at all posttreatment assessments than those who did not. Results provide thresholds for identifying clinically meaningful PTSD symptom change using these measures. Care should be taken to interpret these values appropriately and relative to numerous other definitions for meaningful symptom change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/pas0001098

Cites

12 of 13 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cohen J (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
  2. Kazdin AE (2001). Almost clinically significant (p <.10): Current measures may only approach clinical significance. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8(4), 455– 462. 10.1093/clipsy.8A455 · DOI
  3. Lipsey MW, & Wilson DB (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Sage Publications.
  4. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, & Gandek B (1993). SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide (pp. 10– 16). The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marx, B. P., Lee, D. J., Norman, S. B., Bovin, M. J., Sloan, D. M., Weathers, F. W., Keane, T. M., & Schnurr, P. P.
Affiliations
National Center for PTSD (US)
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
2022-02
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
197-203
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W4200389603
Cited by
199
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 1
FWCI
17.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
US Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 CX000467, 1I01CX000756, I01 HX001876-01A2)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, PCL-5, reliable change, clinically significant change, within-person change, male veterans, psychosocial functioning, PTSD treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Male, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review