Cited by 64Soil erosion and sediment transportSocioeconomics of Resources and ConservationHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes

OFF-SITE COSTS OF SOIL EROSION: A CASE STUDY IN THE WILLAMETTE VALLEY

Open access
Moore, Walter B., McCarl, Bruce A., Moore, Walter B., McCarl, Bruce A.·1987·Unknown

Abstract

This study attempts to provide relative magnitudes of average and marginal costs of off-site sediment-related costs in Oregon's Willamette Valley. Water treatment; road, river channel, and dam maintenance; and hydroelectric generation are examined. Road maintenance and water treatment are nonnegligible average cost items. These costs should not be interpreted as justification for erosion control as marginal cost estimates for water treatment indicate the controls on the margin would yield roughly one-third the average cost.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.22004/ag.econ.32477

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At the federal level, in FY2015, suppression spending exceeded $1.0 billion, split between US Forest Service (70%) and the Department of Interior (30%), with FLAME account appropriations adding another $383 million.

    “At the federal level, in FY2015, suppression spending exceeded $1.0 billion dollars, split between US Forest Service (70 %) and the Department of Interior (30 %), with FLAME account appropriations (i.e., wildfire suppression reserve accounts) adding another $383 million.38”

    From The costs and losses of wildfires: a literature survey (2017) · cites this paper as [38]

  • Similar studies found $196 million per person annually for lake preservation.

    “Similar studies found $196 million per person annually for lake preservation, 137”

    From The costs and losses of wildfires: a literature survey (2017) · cites this paper as [137]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moore, W. B., McCarl, B. A., Moore, W. B., & McCarl, B. A.
Venue
Unknown
Publisher
Unknown
Published
1987
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
42-49
OpenAlex
W2164685422
Cited by
64
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Journal of agricultural and resource economics (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Socioeconomics of Resources and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Keywords
soil erosion, marginal cost, average cost, water treatment, road maintenance, river channel maintenance, dam maintenance, hydropower, erosion control, Willamette Valley

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review