The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Can't We All Just Get Along? The Reality of a Polarized America
Abstract
According to Morris Fiorina, Americans are moderate, tolerant, and ambivalent in their political attitudes. This has always been true and it is, if anything, more true today than in the past. The culture war is almost entirely an elite phenomenon, driven by a small group of activists on the left and right who exert influence far out of proportion to their numbers. It is the elites and activists who are polarized, not the public. In this study we use data from the American National Election Studies and national exit polls to test five major claims made by Fiorina about the state of public opinion in the United States. This evidence indicates that while some of the claims of culture war proponents are overstated, there are deep divisions in America between Democrats and Republicans, between red state voters and blue state voters, and between religious voters and secular voters. These divisions are not confined to a small minority of elected officials and activiststhey involve a large segment of the public and they are likely to increase in the future as a result of long-term trends affecting American society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE NATURE OF BELIEF SYSTEMS IN MASS PUBLICS
Converse, P. E. (2004) · Aarhus University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/jj.35529187.18 · Cited by 2,499
Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies
Dalton, R. J. (1996) · Cited by 1,728
(2004) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,673
Incumbency, Redistricting, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections
Abramowitz, A. I., Alexander, B., & Gunning, M. (2006) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00371.x · Cited by 318
Self-citationBefore the Shooting Begins: Searching for Democracy in America's Culture War.
Horowitz, I. L., & Hunter, J. D. (1995) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2580463 · Cited by 245
Vinoski, S. (2004) · IEEE Internet Computing · doi:10.1109/mic.2004.1260709 · Cited by 159
Ideological Realignment and Active Partisans in the American Electorate
Saunders, K. L., & Abramowitz, A. I. (2004) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x03259195 · Cited by 158
Self-citationKahne, J. E. (1996) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312033001003 · Cited by 57
Cited by
Mason, L. (2015) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12089 · Cited by 1,458
Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (2008) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381608080493 · Cited by 1,308
Self-citationMessing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650212466406 · Cited by 902
Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion
Baldassarri, D., & Gelman, A. (2008) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/590649 · Cited by 874
PARTY POLARIZATION IN AMERICAN POLITICS: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences
Layman, G. C., Carsey, T. M., & Horowitz, J. M. (2006) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.070204.105138 · Cited by 827
Metadata
- Authors
- Abramowitz, A., & Saunders, K.
- Venue
- The Forum
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2005-07-18
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1540-8884 (ISSN-L)
- 2194-6183
- OpenAlex
- W2085604190
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 53.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Can't We All Just Get Along? The Reality of a Polarized America. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2202/1540-8884.1076
- The paper
- Abramowitz, A., & Saunders, K. (2005). Why Can't We All Just Get Along? The Reality of a Polarized America. The Forum. https://doi.org/10.2202/1540-8884.1076
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.